User talk:Hot roller

January 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kidnapping, Caucasian Style— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kidnapping, Caucasian Style. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hot roller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Three years ago, I edited just one article about a popular Russian movie. It seemed to me that I gave a more accurate translation of the Russian word "Балбес" and replaced the word "Fool" with "Booby". The administrator considered this superfluous and canceled the edit. But to block me because of this indefinitily - I think this is superfluous too. Hot roller (talk) 06:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Yes, not acknowledging the warnings probably contributed to the block- and if you had explained your edit and why you made it, the block might not have happened- so I will remove the block. If you have any questions, the Teahouse and Help Desk are available. 331dot (talk) 08:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious as to why it took you three years to request unblock since what you say seems to be true about the translation? Why did you not respond to the two warnings above? What edits do you want to make? 331dot (talk) 07:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Until today, I simply did not know that editing was not available to me. I didn’t know that I was blocked. As for the warnings, I simply did not know that they needed to be answered. I was scolded. They explained everything to me. What is there to comment on? So I did not answer. It was necessary to write "I understood the error, I will no longer"?

I'll going to edit one article, but I’ll check myself first - I have to be sure that article need the correction. Generally, editing rights I'll use, but not right now.Hot roller (talk) 08:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

! I found the bug. I wrote my argument for the changes in the discussion section of article "Kidnapping, Caucasian Style". Instead of writing to the one who canceled my changes. This is because of my carelessness. And because of my English :) I'm apparently Wiki-Neanderthal...Hot roller (talk) 08:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]