User talk:Hosterweis

Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 22 November 2024 T 12:32 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

Replied

I replied at my page. Redwolf24 06:10, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

test

test Hosterweis (talk) (contribs)

Hey

hey hows it going

Thanks for your support

Hi Hosterweis, just a quick note to thank you for your support on my RfA. I was pleased to see so much support, especially from people such as you who I do not know very well, if at all. Now that I am an administrator I will do my best to please the community’s expectations. Best regards, Sam Hocevar 17:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your wang

Category:Wikipedians with big wangs is up for deletion. ~~ N (t/c) 03:30, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment in GC

I saw your comment in Wikipedia:General_complaints (now archived in Wikipedia:General_complaints_(unresolved)) and wanted to let you know that there is actually a link to Mindless_Self_Indulgence in Wikipedia:9/11_victims. You can find it in the section on Lynn Angell - the pipe (|) character in Xoder's signature is the actual link.

Your user page was vandalized

It was, and I figured you'd like to know. --Kizor 00:16, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, thanks. --Hosterweis 00:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The pleasure was mine. Looks like he was more stubborn than I gave him credit for, too. You might want to consider one of those vandalism counters that seem to be all the rage nowadays. --Kizor 10:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

On the list of terminated blogs, User:Hosterweis/Terminated, do you think it might be a good idea to put links to the actual articles, so we can easily spot if they get recreated - or would this invite people to click on the red links and recreate them? Proto t c 12:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add them; if, after a few days, the articles start getting recreated, I'll take them down again. --Hosterweis 00:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

afd

Hi, you added "afd" to the article Caleb Williams, but you forgot to write a reason, see Template:AfD_in_3_steps.--Aleph4 10:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Connolley using Wikipedia to blog?

One administrator thinks so. ~ UBeR 00:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:MindlessSelfIndulgenceAlienatingOurAudience.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MindlessSelfIndulgenceAlienatingOurAudience.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:GTASABOX.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GTASABOX.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AMMercury-boxart.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AMMercury-boxart.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hosterweis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]