User talk:Horton225

Welcome!

Hello, Horton225, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as West Who, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of West Who

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that West Who, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: West Who (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boson was:

Lacking significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:West Who and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Boson (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for suggestions

You wrote on my talk page:

"I made considerable changes from the first draft for the West Who micronation entry. It seems to be in line with many of the articles about other micronations. Can you give me some specific ways to improve the page so that it will be accepted. Thanks."

I am replying here in order to keep the discussion in one place. I will watch this page for a while, so you can reply here, but you can use {{Ping|Boson}} to alert me to your reply.

The content of the article should be verifiable, so you should be careful to ensure that the sources given confirm what the article says. You should avoid representing claims or opinions as fact.
One of the main requirements is that notability be established on the basis of multiple, reliable, independent, published sources. A simple mention is not sufficient to establish notability. With certain exceptions (see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources), self-published sources such as personal Web sites, wikis, blogs, etc. are not generally regarded as reliable sources.
You should provide inline citations (usually done with footnotes) for statements that are likely to be challenged.

I see you have since added some more sources, including The Lonely Planet Guide, which is the way to go. Could you check whether you have given the correct page number? --Boson (talk) 13:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestions. I will work on them. How does a micronation entry like Independent State of Rainbow Creek get approved with just two citations and I have eight?Horton225 (talk) 03:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is quite a lot more that could be said, but I would concentrate on a few points:

As far as meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines goes, the sources need to be independent of the subject of the article.
Whether the subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines depends on whether appropriate sources exist, not necessarily on whether they are listed in the article, so once an article is on Wikipedia it may survive a proposal for deletion if reviewers are able to find appropriate sources.
With very limited exceptions, Wikipedia (like other wikis) may not be used as a "reliable source", so the reference to Wikipedia added after "West Who is a domestic dependent nation" is not appropriate. The link to the article is provided by the preceding wikilink. Quite apart from that, the Wikipedia article does not support the statement that West Who is a domestic dependent nation.
Citations must be verifiable. The first sentence of the article is currently "West Who or Republic of West Who is a micronation", referenced to "Ryan J, Dunford G, Sellars S. "Micronations". Lonely Planet (2006), p. 160. ISBN 1741047307." Could you provide a quotation from page 160 that substantiates the statement?

--Boson (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your help and am trying to reflect your suggestions in the West Who article. On page 4 and 5 in the Micronations book, it discusses what a micronation actually is. "So what is a micronation? The people in this book have decided, for various reasons, to create their own nations." The introduction discusses facets of micronations which apply to West Who. Horton225 (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest familiarizing yourself with Wikipedia's policy on original research. This includes what is called "synthesis", the "analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources". You should cite "reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented". If the cited source merely defines a micronation but does not mention West Who, the source does not support the statement or implication that West Who is a micronation. If the citation is intended merely to support the definition of a micronation, this should be made clearer, but linking to the Micronation article should be sufficient to explain to the reader what is meant by micronation.--Boson (talk) 12:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: West Who (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:West Who and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Horton225, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:West Who

Hello, Horton225. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "West Who".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 10:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:West Who concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:West Who, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:West Who

Hello, Horton225. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "West Who".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 10^Eleventeen 03:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]