User talk:HornAfricans

May 2020

Hello, I'm David Tornheim. An edit you recently made to Bože pravde seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --David Tornheim (talk) 20:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ethiopian Americans, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 11:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HornAfricans, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HornAfricans! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Hoaeter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia, and all edits made in violation of a block or ban may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HornAfricans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia, for some reason I keep getting popups saying my account has been blocked why is this happening? I don't know what I am accused of yet and I am not sure why I can't even add comments to the talk page of an article that I have some concerns about. It says I was blocked by User:Gyrofrog }and I don't know if this has reached them. HornAfricans (talk) 22:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a blocked user attempting to evade their ban. And even if this isn't a sock, your edits have been disruptive. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HornAfricans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How were my edits disruptive? Really, how is improving Wikipedia by organizing pages that are culturally linked into categories, disruptive editing? The reason why I had edited many pages in rapid succession is that I wanted to organize them into categories to show the culturally relevant connections between these topics. HornAfricans (talk) 00:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)HornAfricans (talk) 22:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked as a sock puppet. This does not address that. This seems to be a common issue in unblock requests related to this sock puppeteer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.