User talk:Hoplophile

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Hoplophile, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 07:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gun laws in the United States (by state)

As you are a frequent contributor to this article, you might want to weigh in on the discussion Talk:Gun_laws_in_the_United_States_(by_state)#2009_Brady_Campaign_State_Scorecard. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haynes v. United States

I've started a talk page discussion. Let's continue the discussion there. Shadowjams (talk) 09:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In doing the research on that page, I found a book that looks to have a lot more information about much of the NFA and its challenges, but unfortunately Google book preview isn't available. If you're inclined to find it in hard copy, it might be of some interest: Guns in American society: an encyclopedia of history, politics, culture, and the law, Volume 1, Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law, Gregg Lee Carter, Gregg Lee Carter, ISBN 1576072681. I have no clue what the tone/politics of the book are, but it looked relevant. Shadowjams (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Next time I'm at the library, I'll see if they have a copy. Hoplophile (talk) 22:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation of Gun laws in the United States (by state)

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Gun laws in the United States (by state) was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 15:05, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hoplophile. I hope you will agree to this mediation, by posting the word "agree" and your signature at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Gun laws in the United States (by state)#Parties' agreement to mediation. We might need that for the mediation to proceed. Your subsequent participation in any discussions would be encouraged but optional. Thanks. — Mudwater^(Talk) 13:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are in violation of the 3RR rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DocOfSoc (talk) 01:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The excerpt does not belong in the lead paragraph. Please familiarize yourself with the following policy [1] Please avoid changes that smack of racism to a large portion of any population.

Please Remember to edit in "Good Faith." In addition, the info is already contained in the body of the article so is redundant. I see you have not made many edits and in good faith I am assuming you are not familiar with Wiki's policies or pillars. You may want to do so. Happy Editing! Shalom! DocOfSoc (talk) 02:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The Request for mediation concerning Gun laws in the United States (by state), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 00:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.)

ANI Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Mesa is a suburb not satellite City

"The Chicago Cubs have held spring training in Mesa, Ariz., on and off since the 1950s, and residents of the Phoenix suburb obviously want them to stay." http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2010/11/03/cubs-spring-training-to-stay-in-arizona-after-voters-approve-st/

"In the 5th Congressional District, which includes Tempe, Mesa and other southeast Phoenix suburbs, incumbent Mitchell is battling Republican challenger David Schweikert in a repeat of the 2008 race." http://www.trivalleycentral.com/articles/2010/10/27/maricopa_monitor/news/doc4cc7112757c8b356871218.txt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oak999 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Subtropics, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Nullarbor has a semi-arid climate, not a subtropical. Bidgee (talk) 10:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Subtropics. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arizona Citizens Defense League

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arizona Citizens Defense League, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.azcdl.org/html/our_goals.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arizona Citizens Defense League

The article Arizona Citizens Defense League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The organization is not notable. See Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felsic2 (talk) 23:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arizona Citizens Defense League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arizona Citizens Defense League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arizona Citizens Defense League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Felsic2 (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hoplophile. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hoplophile. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]