User talk:Hop on Bananas

Welcome!

Hello, Hop on Bananas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cookie Thief (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Cookie Thief and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hop on Bananas, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much

Thanks for your category addition edit at Lisa the Skeptic.

Much appreciated,

— Cirt (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cookie Thief Sesame Street 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cookie Thief Sesame Street 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Actually, it's used in my Cookie Thief draft Draft:The Cookie Thief. Hop on Bananas (talk) 00:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is a draft, not an article. To meet fair use, the image has to specifically be on an active article. Steel1943 (talk) 01:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem with using fair use images in draft articles? From File:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg If you are writing a draft article that will have fair use images in it once it reaches the article space, you can simply add a colon to it. For example, changing to Image:foo.jpg will prevent the image being removed. If the image does get deleted, I'll reupload it when the article is launched. (Speaking of which, the only sources I found were some news articles on Google News, which I might use. I tried Google Scholar and I thought I saw 2 results, but when I checked they were from 1985 and 1992. (They seemed to be both Sesame Street-related, but neither was about this special). Hop on Bananas (talk) 13:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use is for main space articles only, not drafts, sandboxes, user pages etc. (WP:RFUI Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 20:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, why can't FU images be used in drafts? Draft are basically pre-lauch articles (if there's an important difference, explain it). Hop on Bananas (talk) 03:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To minimize the total number of times items of non-free content are included within the encyclopedia. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 03:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, drafts and their corresponding articles never coexist, so I think you're still not getting it. Hop on Bananas (talk) 03:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually; I'm citing the wrong policy. To To minimize legal exposure by limiting the amount of non-free content, I should say. But I don't have to argue about this. WP:NFCC#9 says: " Non-free content is allowed only in articles (not disambiguation pages), and only in article namespace, subject to exemptions." Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 03:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why shouldn't drafts be exceptions? I've yet to receive a reason why. Hop on Bananas (talk) 03:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Those pages that are exempt are listed in Category:Wikipedia non-free content criteria exemptions." "To make a request for a page to be placed in this category, please post to a request to Wikipedia talk:Non-free content." For the record, these are all image deletion pages (and therefor not main space articles); the kind of exemptions that "specifically ... are used to manage questionable non-free content." Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 03:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cookie Thief (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Cookie Thief and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, could someone explain why my sources are unacceptable? Hop on Bananas (talk) 22:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My sources are reliable, talk extensively about the subject, and are independent of it. Isn't there a policy that plot summaries don't need sources since their source is the movie or something? Hop on Bananas (talk) 20:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cookie Thief (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Cookie Thief and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cookie Thief has been accepted

The Cookie Thief, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the deleted image, I still have it on my iPad, so I can just reupload it. Hop on Bananas (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA nominee

Hai, I have nominated the film article Loham for GA-status. Which is currently on "Hold on" time and there are some corrections to be done before it ends. Mainly copy editing for grammer and writting style. For making it a good article there are some suggestions referred in Talk:Loham. I invite you to make your contributions to it.--Charles Turing (talk) 08:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research

I have reverted two instances where you added the "Original Research" template. The template instructions state, "Note: This template should not be applied without explanation on the talk page, and should be removed if the original research is not readily apparent when no explanation is given." There is no way to tell from your edits what material you claim is original research. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 19:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects and inappropriate content

Please don't create redirects, such as Sgdhdundjdjndjfjfjfkrjrhheuwjwii. No redirects are allowed to point to user or draft space. This is considered vandalism. Also, don't create unneeded redirects, such as Wikipedia:NOR noticeboard. Nowhere is that template used and there are already redirects for it. Bgwhite (talk) 05:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding templates to file page

Hi Hop on Bananas, thank you for trying to help by adding templates to file information pages. However I've reverted your additions as the files you added them to are actually located on Wikimedia Commons so the information you are adding should have been added to the Commons page rather than the English Wikipedia page (and in some cases was there already). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Non-free content

Hi Hop on Bananas. I just want to let you know that I moved two of your replies added to Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 64#Regarding the press image policy and did some other minor formatting fixing per WP:TPG#Fixing format errors to make the thread a bit easier to follow. I also linked to the non-free images you added using WP:COLON. Non-free images are only allowed to be used in the article namespace per WP:NFCC#9; Such images should be linked to, not displayed, when used on talk pages, etc. as part of any discussion. I did not change any of the content of your posts, just tweaked the formating per WP:TPG. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg

Why are you adding {{watermark}} to this file? I can't find any watermark. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does have a trademark notice. While not watermarks per se, they do obstruct use of an image. Hop on Bananas (talk) 20:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The trademark sign is a part of the logo. We do not add {{watermark}} when a logo contains a trademark sign for the same reason as we do not add {{watermark}} to paintings which were signed by the painter. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I suppose so. Note that I once saw a logo with this template for the same reason. By your logic, it should be removed (which I may do). Hop on Bananas (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, a trademark notice is not part of the logo per se. It's basically a notice that this logo is trademarked. So it's basically equivalent to a copyright notice. For most logos, did the designer put in a a trademark notice as part of the logo design, before it was trademarked? If anyone ever did that, it would pretty much be the logo equivalent of a trompe l'oeil. In any case, do you think logos with trademark notices are preferrable/superior to ones without, or support adding them to logos that never had them? Hop on Bananas (talk) 02:04, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santa Baby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Mitchell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, who I was trying to link to is not listed on the disambig and doesn't have an article. Hop on Bananas (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Hop on Bananas (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj Khalifa PDP.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Burj Khalifa PDP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hop on Bananas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Random selfmade image.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Random selfmade image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Popsicle patent 3.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Popsicle patent 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Self-made scribble 2015.jpg

The file File:Self-made scribble 2015.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTWEBHOST, no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Random doodle 1.png.jpg

The file File:Random doodle 1.png.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTWEBHOST, no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Neudraw file.jpg

The file File:Neudraw file.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTWEBHOST, no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whole stuffed camel, unknown source, 2015.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whole stuffed camel, unknown source, 2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. agtx 19:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hop on Bananas/piehole listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:Hop on Bananas/piehole. Since you had some involvement with the User:Hop on Bananas/piehole redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tinton5 (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flickr Big Bird.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flickr Big Bird.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephen Jay Gould 2015, portrait (unknown date).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stephen Jay Gould 2015, portrait (unknown date).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]