User talk:Hooters2

The article Max chevelair has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Max chevelair

A tag has been placed on Max chevelair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Atomic1609 15:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Max chevelair

A tag has been placed on Max chevelair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Tckma 16:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverinebuckdoe

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wolverinebuckdoe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Wolverinebuckdoe. —Travis ^talk 15:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Wolverinebuckdoe. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. —Travis ^talk 15:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 63rd Depot

A tag has been placed on 63rd Depot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Rjhatl (talk) 14:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I've deleted this as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Wikipedia:Your first article.

For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion

If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.

If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:Hooters2/test.

Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 22:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Deletion of 63rd Depot

hey i just wanted to write to you that I believe the article 63rd Depot should stay up because it is soon going to be a part of pop culture. I have checked my sources, because I went to Frenchmans house for the interview (I'm sorry but in the interview, he asked his real name to be ananymous) I would just like for you to take the time and re think the article. I have explained why it is notable, there for i think it deserves to be an article. If you could possibly help me edit the article so it could be put on wikipedia, please tell me and I would love to accept your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hooters2 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Have you got any reliable sources with verifiable information showing they now meet WP:BIO? Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so notability must be established before an article is created. Also, you need to rethink how you want to write this. Declarative sentences, 3rd person, no flowery terms or fluff. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 02:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I find nothing on Google search that would support the content of this article. Dloh cierekim 02:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Such sources as you mention are not reliable sources. The lack of such suggests the subject does not meet notability requirements for this encyclopedia. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 13:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]