User talk:Hoofheartedinthewinnercircle

Notability of Bobby Saxon

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bobby Saxon, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bobby Saxon seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bobby Saxon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 20:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at John Stossel. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. THF 03:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add unreferenced or inadequately referenced controversial biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles. Thank you. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read Wikipedia's policies regarding material on living persons. Note especially the warning that editors who reinsert unsourced or poorly-sourced material after it has been deleted are subject to being blocked. We mean it. Raymond Arritt 22:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at John Stossel. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been reverted several times on this same point- please stop adding it. Discuss on Talk page if you wish. Tvoz |talk 01:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly inserting material in violation of Wikipedia policies on biographies of living persons. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Raymond Arritt 02:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Curious

Is there some reason that your edits closely match those of Mrwalkers (talk · contribs)? It seems unusual that two accounts would appear at essentially the same time, both making very similar arguments. If you're using multiple accounts, or encouraging friend(s) to argue on your behalf, or have been encouraged to do so, I encourage you to review WP:SOCK. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Flemming

Please discuss this dispute on the Brian Flemming Talk Page. --George100 09:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]