User talk:Honest1236

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Shewa, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Dessie. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - 220.101 talk^\Contribs 15:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dessie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

religion, while less than 30% of the population said they practiced [[Islam in Ethiopia|Muslim]]] and 1.15% were [[P'ent'ay|Protestants]].<ref>[http://www.csa.gov.et/index.php?option=com_rubberdoc&

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Honest1236. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Honest1236. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 05:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 99.53.112.186. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Amhara people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Amharas, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amharas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:50, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]