User talk:Homo sapien99

I think you know what you're doing to the Harmandir Sahib article is clearly agenda-laden and not fact, you want desperately for the Sikh Golden Temple to be some sort of Hindu shrine. While being open to people of all faiths, the services are exclusively Sikh, like it or not. Keep screwing with the article and I may have to go further. I think you're a sock anyway.3swordz (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although I do not agree with 3Swordz wording, I feel you will be blocked if you do not stop Homosapien. Please stop. Thanks--Sikh-History 08:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Harmandhir Sahib, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Sikh-History 08:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Harmandir Sahib. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Please stop before you are blocked from editing Sikh-History 08:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sikh History... I have visited your page. I have some questions for you. --Homo sapien99 (talk) 08:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes? --Sikh-History 08:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What was the name of first guru.... I would love to know the exact name please?--Homo sapien99 (talk) 08:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Nanak, Baba Nanak, Nanak Sahib, Sufi Nanak. He goes by various names. Thanks --Sikh-History 08:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well... what we have read till now is "Guru Nanan Dev" ..... There are many institutions on the same name..... also we have Guru Nanak Dev University in Amritsar, India. Please care to explain that from where such dialects/variations came in a Proper Noun.... I dont find it suitable at all to change the proper names of our gurus. Especially when it comes to Scholars and literate people.--Homo sapien99 (talk) 09:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Take your own time.... but please do not get biased anyhow.... You have studied history, God has given you the power of literacy. you ought to respect the terms like "Study", "Logistics", "Unchangeable facts" and "Fairness" . I am always open to logical discussions. Thanks --Homo sapien99 (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Harmandir Sahib, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sikh-History 11:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't have any answer to my question. Amazingly that was just first question. Well I thought your qualification would be worth but ...... anyways, I think you need to study the real facts to enhance your "knowledge" and not "Perception". Wish you best of luck. --Homo sapien99 (talk) 19:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Homo sapien99, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sikh-History 19:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was not a personal attack. That was a mirror which reflects your knowledge. You call yourself Sikh History, and don't even know the proper name of first Guru. I am amazed.--Homo sapien99 (talk) 19:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Harmandir Sahib. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 20:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Harmandir Sahib, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sikh-History 07:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--John (talk) 07:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]