User talk:Holy0cow

April 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Types of rape, you may be blocked from editing. To have returned the content you did into the article, you will have seen the article history and been aware that the content was removed - by consensus - as it did not meet the rationale of the article; noting types of rape. Your familiarity with WP standards evidenced by your other edits provides an indication that you are not a new editor, and would be aware of the effect of your edits - which were therefore intended and thus disruptive. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did what seemed right. There's no independent article about gang rape and I don't want it to be deleted entirely. Why do you delete it? Gang rape is type of rape, so it should be here.--Holy0cow (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect page Gang rape is locked!--Holy0cow (talk) 19:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been suspended indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am advised you have been reverting back various edits by a previously blocked sock of a banned editor, and given the shared interests and articles of said banned editor, I have blocked you per WP:DUCK. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Holy0cow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sockpuppet only because you gave me no other chance. I was blocked unjustly as user:Giornorosso. Anyway, I don't understand why you destroy my edits, I added some maps into the articles, so be so kind and revert it back. Holy0cow (talk) 20:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you openly admitted to the block evasion, then we have nothing else to discuss. –MuZemike 20:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.