User talk:Hocmyfitegre

Welcome!

Hello, Hocmyfitegre, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Andrew delaplaine, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 08:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew delaplaine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Andrew delaplaine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 08:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advice coming within an hour. JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. I am afraid you are finding that writing an acceptable article is more difficult than you expected. I suggest you use WP:Articles for creation to guide you through the process. Some advice:

Read WP:Your first article.
References are vital. Wikipedia is quite selective about article subjects. The test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability, and looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Lists of what Delaplaine has written will not count for notability, it needs independent commentary about him, such as reviews. See WP:Notability (summary) and WP:AUTHOR for more about this.
Wikipedia is extremely resistant to being used to sell anything. You can link to his website, but don't use promotional language like "his fantastic series", or seem to be inviting the reader to buy, "over 100 Travel guides to choose from" or "please stop by... " Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and the tone should reflect that.
If you are Andrew Delaplaine, or employed by him, read WP:Autobiography and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Delaplaine (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, User:Hocmyfitegre/sandbox, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Delaplaine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hocmyfitegre/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hocmyfitegre, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Hocmyfitegre/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Hocmyfitegre/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, please do not create multiple copies of drafts. This confuses the reviewers. Second, I for one will not review a a sandbox draft without moving it to draft space, which I can't, because you have another draft in draft space. This is better than the one in draft space. I suggest that you request speedy deletion of the draft in draft space as user-requested, and then this draft can be moved into draft space and reviewed. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Hocmyfitegre, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

February 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Andrew Delaplaine (1), from its old location at User:Hocmyfitegre/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Delaplaine (1) (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Delaplaine (1) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Delaplaine

The article Andrew Delaplaine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. The NYT ref is a dead link. IMDb alone is not enough to support a BLP article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 10:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Delaplaine (1) (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit as there's still nothing amounting to his own independent notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Delaplaine (1) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm PamD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Andrew Delaplaine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I can see nothing in your cited reference to support anything in the article beyond his existence and the one film he made. If the article mentioned the film, you could use that ref to support that statement. PamD 11:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Delaplaine

The article Andrew Delaplaine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - one festival nomination isn't enough

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 11:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Delaplaine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Delaplaine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Delaplaine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 14:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Andrew Delaplaine. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Joe Roe (talk) 20:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Hocmyfitegre! I'm Joe Roe. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Joe Roe (talk) 21:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Delaplaine (1)

Hello, Hocmyfitegre. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Andrew Delaplaine".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]