User talk:Hmlarson/Archive/1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Chicago Red Stars
I don't think it was appropriate to split the Stars' page up like that... discussion started on the talk page there. CyMoahk (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Hmm... Here are several examples of a team page being split w/ similar circumstances of being in different leagues of varying status:
- Seattle Sounders (disambiguation)
- Portland Timbers (disambiguation)
- Boston Breakers - I think the current page also needs to be split up for WPSLE and NWSL.
Hmlarson (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- The Sounders and Timbers aren't really "similar circumstances" - more detail on the Red Stars' talk page. CyMoahk (talk) 20:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Hmlarson/Isabel Farrell has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Isabel Farrell, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 04:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
avs5221(talk|contrib) 02:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
avs5221(talk|contrib) 02:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julia Roberts.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Smcg8374 (talk) 08:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CTS talk 11:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Megan Kufeld.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! David_FLXD (Talk) 18:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Annie Sittauer.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! David_FLXD (Talk) 19:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Frederick.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! David_FLXD (Talk) 19:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
David_FLXD (Talk) 19:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Message re player articles submitted via AfC
Hi Hmlarson, it seems you're working your way through the wholeSeattle Sounders squad! I thought perhaps I should explain why some individual's articles are being accepted and others rejected, even by the same reviewer.
According to Wikipedia's Soccer Notability guideline a player must have played in a FULLY PROFESSIONAL league in order to qualify in terms of notability. Otherwise, we view the player as not notable. Sophie Reiser, therefore, is accepted, while Megan Kufeld is not. These guidelines, however, are not set in stone. If a player has also received some additional recognition, especially substantial recognition, that may override the guideline. This, though, is a somewhat subjective, and editors will differ in their interpretations. Julia K. Roberts is a close call. Michelle French is clearly notable. Avs5221 clearly felt that the ESPN award was enough to move Isabel Farrell into the notable group, and accepted the article. I would have dithered, and might have come down on either side of the fence.
I hope I have helped you to understand what is going on. I imagine you might have been very confused and frustrated otherwise!
The more you can show in your article why a given player is notable, the better the chance to get her article accepted. Regards, David_FLXD (Talk) 19:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
David_FLXD (Talk) 19:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Sophie Reiser
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sophie Reiser, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
- NOTE: An admin has already declined this Speedy Deletion nomination, so you don't have to do anything for now. David_FLXD (Talk) 03:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Megan Kufeld.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nomination of Annie Sittauer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie Sittauer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Sittauer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 05:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)