User talk:Hmkwfrance

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, Hmkwfrance, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ravensfire (talk) 19:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a blog or a journal

Hi, Wikipedia isn't a blog or a journal: WP:NOTJOURNAL, consider if the content is encyclopedic before you add them to the pages. In any case, WP:BEBOLD but please make sure you cite reliable, published sources for any and every content you add to articles. Citing content from libraries of Dawat e Hadiyah or Aljamea tus Saifiyah is fine, too.

Wikipedia isn't the place for publishing or authoring content even if it is known to be true: WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH. Only if it the content is published by reliable sources may you add it to the page.

Also, Wikipedia isn't a place for platitudes, appeal to authority, and hyperbole: see WP:NPOV and WP:DUE for the style to employ whilst writing articles.

Special care must be taken for articles of living persons. Any content on biography of living persons that is present without citations can and will be removed at any given time without warning. It is better to cite third party sources, whilst self-published first-party sources okay only in some very specific cases. Read: WP:BLP.

Also, please refrain from uploading copyrighted images unless of course you own copyright to them.

I encourage you to abide by the rules and contribute sensibly. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 10:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hmkwfrance: drop me an email: mark.sunnyvale at gmail dot com Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 15:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hmkwmumbai@gmail.com Hmkwfrance (talk) 15:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aliasgar Kalimuddin

The article Aliasgar Kalimuddin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 19:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Baahubali 2: The Conclusion, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tina Datta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Everything you add to an article MUST be backed up by a reliable source. You can read that page for help on what is a reliable source and what isn't, and the HELP:CITE page on how to include those sources in your edit. Ravensfire (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever I right about Tina dutta was correct Hmkwfrance (talk) 18:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmkwfrance, and if it's not sourced, how would a reader verify that? That's a core concept of Wikipedia, the ability of a reader to verify what's written in the article and is the basis of the sourcing requirement. So "Whatever" is not a good response and conflicts with Wikipedia's core principles. Ravensfire (talk) 19:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hmkwfrance. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Dawoodi Bohra, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Ravensfire (talk) 00:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Syedi Hasan Feer, you may be blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you aren't sure how, see the Reliable Source page for what is a reliable source and HELP:CITE on how to use them. Ravensfire (talk) 15:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saifee Mahal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saifee Mahal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 00:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be aware that the article was deleted several years ago - WP:Articles_for_deletion/Saifee_Mahal. You need to make sure that any concerns there are addressed or it may end up deleted again. Ravensfire (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ammar Jamaluddin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ammar Jamaluddin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Idris Badruddin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Idris Badruddin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 14:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Huzaifa Mohyuddin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Huzaifa Mohyuddin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qasim Hakim Uddin

Please add citations/references to the article because any article with no citation are prone to Blp proded for living people . Fisha Malik (talk) 10:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Hmkwfrance (talk) 10:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC) If you like I am moving it into draft space so you can improve there and welcome to move again in mainspace when you will finish the job, thanksFisha Malik (talk) 10:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't move into a draft space just give me a little more time. We will finish it Hmkwfrance (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmkwfrance, sorry bro but it is difficult to keep unreferenced article in mainspace for long time. But I can help you with citation to Saifee Mahal as it is covered deeply in mainstream Indian media

you seem to be in a difficulty regarding creating articles if you like I can help you on my special userpage regarding the articles you are creatingFisha Malik (talk) 13:57, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Hmkwfrance (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Fisha Malik

Hello, Hmkwfrance. You have new messages at User:Fisha Malik/Hmkwfrance.
Message added 14:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fisha Malik (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

U plz remove Qasim Hakimuddin draft page make it to a Wikipedia page Hmkwfrance (talk) 15:39, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmkwfrance, that page has zero references. None. Please, you need to understand that using reliable sources on Wikipedia articles isn't optional. It's in draft space to give you the time to add those references and to better show why this person is notable. I've added the AFC Draft template, so when you think it's ready, you'll just need to click on the button. It will then go in the queue to be reviewed. As the article is right now, I can guarantee it would be rejected for lack of sources, hence my comments... The review can take while to happen, there's a lot of articles pending review. There's no time limit here, so don't worry about how long it takes, just use the time to continue improving that article (more reliable sources!!) or other articles. Ravensfire (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, this is wikipidea and as a wikipedian I have to follow certain rules so without any citations I am unable to make it live, before moving it to main space please add citations, as far as I concerned I am unable to find any third party reference regarding Qasim Hakimuddin, so I may not help you, I am helping you with Saify Mahal as I can find indepth coverage of it, if you're agree to improve the article Saify Mahal, please ask on my special page which I have created for your help, please do not talk again to move Qasim Hakimuddin in mainspace until and unless you find the sources, again you are welcome in my special userpage regarding saify mahal Fisha Malik (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remove draft

Hi,

The page of Qasim Hakimuddin has been completed. U just remove it's drafts now. Make it to non draft page Hmkwfrance (talk) 05:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Qasim Hakimuddin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Qasim Hakimuddin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from thedawoodibohras.com/2018/04/05/obituary-mazoon-al-dawat-syedi-qasim-bhaisaheb-hakimuddin. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Your addition to Abbas Fakhruddin has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You've entirely copy-pasted text from a source into a Wikipedia article. Don't do that - that's a copyright issue. I've removed the text and have asked for the version to be revision deleted. You must entirely rewrite the text, completely, in your own words. The text was also highly promotional - this isn't an obituary written by a religious group, but an encyclopedia article. Ravensfire (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zeninfosys

You've used this in various article and there's zero information about this source that I can find. Can you describe the source? Forums? User-submitted material? How does this meet reliable source criteria? Is it a primary source? Ravensfire (talk) 13:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ammar Jamaluddin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ammar Jamaluddin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Jamaluddin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravensfire (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 13:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry it has come to this, but there are way too many warnings on your talk page, you're not making much progress and are turning into a time-sink. The recent creating of articles in main article space rather than improving the draft articles already out there and you just copy-pasted text from a source was the final straw. Ravensfire (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating WP:COPYVIO on multiple occasions. Now you are at the stage where you work to assure the community you absorbed the policy to act accordingly. Good luck.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 13:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El C, would you mind looking at the edits of 178.61.8.29 (talk · contribs), I'm pretty sure it's Hmkwfrance. They uploaded some images on commons (copyright vio's again and now blocked there because of it) and the IP added links to those images here. The IP has also removed AFD tags on several pages Hmkwfrance created. Ravensfire (talk) 20:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked – for a period of 3 years. El_C 20:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Idris Badruddin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idris Badruddin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idris Badruddin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravensfire (talk) 13:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qusai Vajihuddin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Qusai Vajihuddin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 14:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Huzaifa Mohyuddin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huzaifa Mohyuddin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huzaifa Mohyuddin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravensfire (talk) 14:27, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn this discussion, and apologize for creating it in the first place. As a head of a major sect of Islam, there's inherent notability in that. Again, apologies. Ravensfire (talk) 04:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abbas Fakhruddin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abbas Fakhruddin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbas Fakhruddin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 06:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huzaifa Mohyuddin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AH. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saifee Mahal

Hello, Hmkwfrance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saifee Mahal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Qusai Vajihuddin

Hello, Hmkwfrance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Qusai Vajihuddin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Qasim Hakimuddin

Hello, Hmkwfrance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Qasim Hakimuddin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hmkwfrance (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin, I have request to you to please kindly unblock my account from wikipedia. Its been nearly 10 months since I couldn't be able to edit and expand the pages plz lift and remove the block of my account. I assured to that I won't break your terms and conditions of wikipedia account. Plz give ma chance and allow me to edit and expand the pages of prominent people

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In answering these questions, you literally violated copyright by copying and pasting your answers from elsewhere. Unfortunately, this proves pretty conclusively you either don't understand copyright or have no intention of abiding by copyright. --Yamla (talk) 10:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't copy-paste and I abiding copyrights

Will u plz unblock me? Hmkwfrance (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply not true and will count against you in any future unblock request. You directly copied and pasted from Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright, at the very least. --Yamla (talk) 10:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

YOU MUST IMMEDIATELY STOP copying and pasting copyrighted content from other sources and placing it here. IMMEDIATELY STOP. Any further instances of this and I will be required to remove your talk page access. This is your final warning. --Yamla (talk) 10:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also see over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hmkwfrance/Archive that you've been extensively evading the block on this account. Given the combination of your blatant copyright violations and your recent block evasion, there's frankly no realistic possibility you'll be unblocked at this time. Your best bet (though it's slim, given how abusive you've been and continue to be) is to wait six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to address your continued copyright violations and your extensive block evasion. I'm sorry I didn't have better news for you. Hopefully this time gives you an opportunity to better familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines and decide if you wish to stop being so abusive. --Yamla (talk) 10:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But plz unblock I will abide your policy and condition. Plz unblock me and allow me to edit Hmkwfrance (talk) 12:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will not do so, and I strongly suggest no other admin is likely to do so either, not until at least six months have passed since your last edit. --Yamla (talk) 12:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will see you. I will block your account at anytime. Just wait and watch Hmkwfrance (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

STOP Hmkwfrance (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

plz unblock me Hmkwfrance (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to make another unblock request, do so, but I would note that your best route is to wait 6 months to make another unblock request and in that time also not edit Wikipedia using any other account or IP address. At that point, with you showing understanding of the copyright policy and why sockpuppetry is disruptive, an unblock request may be accepted. However, at this point an unblock request is very unlikely to be accepted. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hmkwfrance. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]