User talk:Hkrussell/sandbox
Hkrussell's peer review
[edit]The additions to the geography and gender sections were vital pieces of information and were also coming from neutral and unbiased sources. The structure was easy to follow and it had an inclusive coverage. The sources were reliable and the links worked. Hgoodm3 (talk) 01:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)hgoodm3
Hkrussell's peer review
[edit]I liked how this article was not biased. It included a bunch of helpful statistics on the internet usage. The only changes I would consider would be to add information that is different from statistics. This would be an improvement to your article because it will keep the reader interested. Overall, it was good information and would be very helpful to the article as a whole. Hrase1 (talk) 04:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review Response
[edit]In response to the peer reviews left on this Talk page, I kept the majority of my contribution. I did add more information that was less statistics based. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:E40:8A00:E563:C1C6:ED6D:9EF8 (talk) 00:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)