Please explain why this is "a better version to be". I've pressed my claim on the talk pages of both the HIT article and 马兴毅's one. Your version, which is exactly the same as the user's above, contains clumsy and grammatical problems with irrelevant information.Biomedicinal (contact) 15:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree. You must enter the discussion at the talk page. You mustn't keep reverting to the version of your choice. If you keep doing that, you may end up blocked from editing. The best way for you to have the article how you like, is to discuss it. You can't force the article to the way you prefer. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted again to the version of the other editor's choice. He is trying to engage you in a discussion at the talk page. You are simply trying to force your version without discussion. That is not appropriate. Wikipedia works by discussion and consensus.
Please leave the current version in place and use the talk page. If you persist in reverting, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know and I don't care which version of the article is better. I'm not taking sides about that and for all I know, you may be right. But, if one editor wants to discuss things at the article talk page, which he is trying to do, and has taken great care to present his case, then you must discuss things too. Click edit. Respond, please. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
