User talk:Hirpex

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hirpex! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 09:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

Hi Hirpes. This is an account I use for rather anonymous users. I don't where you went to seek the etymological explanations on Liquidambar orientalis but they will sound rather gullible for any speaker of the language. I am referring to your edits starting [here http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Liquidambar_orientalis&diff=next&oldid=294383876] that I intend to erase. I will appreciate in which source you went to seek them though. Pembeana (talk) 21:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: your message

Hi Hirpex, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 15:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Long pepper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Eng. WP s.v. Ulna

Hi Hirpex. Sorry I have not replied to your post on my talkpage until now, but I somehow missed it... I am bit unsure what the post is about (I have way to many articles on my watchlist and use far to much time on Wikipedia). But I think I reverted your edit, where you put the translation of ulna into the infobox [1]. Sorry for badly written explanation for the reversion by the way (it was written fast on a smartphone seconds from my stop on a train heading home from work... so all odds where against me).

I am all for etymology on Latin words in anatomy articles. But in my opinion these should not be placed in the infobox; the infobox is for e.g. finding the term (latest Terminologia Anatomica) so e.g. Danes, Germans, Italians and so on can use to find extra information outside wikipedia. For me that could be taking an anatomical atlas and looking up "ulna", for my mom it could be finding out: "Ahh, when my doctor writes fractured ulna in my journal it means this bone". That said: You are more than welcome to include an etymology section where the roots of the word and/or it now modern misuse (there is actually a debate going on about this on WP:MED if you are interested). A good example of how I would like to see such information be presented is the etymology section of Fibula or more exotic Waragis history section.

If cubitus has or still somewhere is used as an alternative term for ulna, then the word cubitus should be listed in the infobox (maybe with a wiktonary link, or written in parenthesis older term or something like that)... and again a etymology section if you are up for it.

I hope all my rambling makes sentence otherwise just write. By the way i added your talkpage to my watchlist so you can just write below if you like. Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 12:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hirpex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hirpex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]