User talk:Hipocrite/06/2014

SAS81

I don't think your recent discussions (on his talk and the article talk) about SAS81's behavior, background, etc are productive. I find them a distraction from the very real policy disputes being discussed on the article talk page.

I'd like to see SAS81's contributions restricted to simple edit requests - not that it's likely to happen. It doesn't appear he will overcome his coi problems enough to understand the relevant policies/guidelines. I think it's best just to ignore him at this point best we can, while pointing out the more blatant policy misunderstandings when he repeats them too often. --Ronz (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

fine. Hipocrite (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Much appreciated. --Ronz (talk) 15:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your closure of your AE requst concerning SAS81

Hi, I have undone this closure. As a party to the request, you may not close it because arbitration enforcement proceedings may examine the conduct of all parties to a request. Also, because Arbitration Committee decisions delegate enforcement authority to uninvolved administrators, it is they (or arbitration functionaries) who decide what to do with a request once submitted. Regards,  Sandstein  17:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK Fail

You might want to switch from days to hours or minutes. [1] EEng (talk) 14:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

I can't figure out the template to do hours/minutes since. Hopefully it'll get up to the months since range sooner rather than later. Hipocrite (talk) 14:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

An interesting statistic would be "champion nominators/reviewers/preppers/promoters of DYK hooks later pulled off MP". But really (and I mean this) -- the problem is the process -- this utterly imbecile idea of "new content". EEng (talk) 14:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Template fixed to show minutes hours days whatever {{Time ago}}. If the process is broken, the way to show that is through documentation of failure. Hipocrite (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)