User talk:Himanshubaigoman

Requesting for unblock from Wikipedia.

Himanshubaigoman, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Himanshubaigoman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Baigoman. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. – NJD-DE (talk) 20:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 20:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Himanshubaigoman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Raja Shri Amarendra Singh, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baigoman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baigoman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 23:44, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Indian Medical Association, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. No adding references. scope_creep^Talk 09:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gaya, India, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Shri Rajpati Singh Ji of Baigoman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raja Shri Rajpati Singh Ji of Baigoman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baigoman

The article Baigoman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and no WP:RS were provided

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- DaxServer (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever article I have been editing and trying to publish is a part of history. I am not claiming myself to be, but the history is history. Everything can't come in newspaper. I have published articles which is existing since 200 years ago. And the source is my family itself. You can visit the village and ask villagers about it. But if Wikipedia only wants to publish for their profit and gain then it's fine. Delete this article. And whatever I have published. But make sure no article will be published on my family history. Thank you. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Himanshubaigoman: You need to add references, one per line. Please take a look at WP:REFB and WP:CITE. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 14:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of source should I give. Any news article? My family is living a simple life in village. The zamindari has been abolished. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally you would need WP:THREE to prove it is notable. Search the web, using common search terms exclusive to the article. Google Books is another area that can be searched. Use this application, Google Book ref creator to create a ref for you. You just plug in a google book URL, and it creates an Google Book ref in Wiki format, that can be copied straight into the article. There is references available in Google Books. Mountains of them, so your article can be saved. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 15:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is stuff Zambari, so look for the Baigoman stuff. An extensive search is needed. scope_creep^Talk 15:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 04:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Himanshubaigoman! Your additions to Baigoman have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 - again

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kachhwaha, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know more than my ancestors presence and their history? Himanshubaigoman (talk) 12:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not interested in what I know, or don't know; similarly, Wikipedia is not interested in what you know, or don't know.
Wikipedia is only interested in what has been published in reliable, independent sources, which need to be cited in order to support information added to our pages.
Deleting such reliably sourced information, is always considered as vandalism. - Arjayay (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lok Janshakti Party, you may be blocked from editing. ItsSkV08 (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tekari Raj. ItsSkV08 (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected wrong information. If Wikipedia wants to publish false information about anything or any particular person for political advantage, I need to move to the court. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 13:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If Wikipedia will publish wrong infromation with wrong intention then I need to take a legal action against you. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if you have sources, please go ahead and edit whatever you want.. ItsSkV08 (talk) 13:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sources. In this case, Chirag Paswan has removed Pashupati Paras from LJP. It is available in every news channel. So you don't interrupt for your political propaganda. If you wanna talk to me. Drop your contact details. My team will contact you as soon as possible. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 13:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contact Admin first, before any change ItsSkV08 (talk) 13:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then who are you to delete my edits?? Should I call you biased. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 05:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care. Now I feel this Wikipedia publish wrong information and biased with political propaganda and religion. The peaceful religion. Himanshubaigoman (talk) 05:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Himanshubaigoman/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Himanshubaigoman/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hayleez (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Raja Shri Amarendra Singh

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Raja Shri Amarendra Singh. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hayleez (talk) 15:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raja Shri Rajpati Singh Ji of Baigoman

Hello, Himanshubaigoman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raja Shri Rajpati Singh Ji of Baigoman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]