User talk:HiRachel420

Welcome!

Hello, HiRachel420, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HiRachel420, please take a look at this page to learn about sourcing your entries. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence As you will see, all content must be verifiable. Please do not include unsourced material in your Wikipedia edits. Thank you! Farr4h2004 (talk) 01:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

🙄🖕🏽💁🏻‍♀️ HiRachel420 (talk) 06:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HiRachel420, I do not appreciate the emojis. This is another warning not to vandalize the ElevationsRTC page. All content you add should be verifiable. If you do it again, you will be reported for vandalism. Thank you. Farr4h2004 (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Farr4h2004:, Vandalism has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia, it is the intentional defacing of an article, not the adding of unsourced or improperly verified content. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HI Beeblebrox, HiRachel420 has been warned and is continuing to put the unverified and unsourced content back. It is my understanding that this is edit warring. I warned this person, and they put an emoji flipping off in response. This is disrespectful and not civil. Farr4h2004 (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This probably is a good time to point out to both of you that edit warring is indeed strongly frowned upon. There is no right and wrong side in an edit war, all parties participating are considered to be equally at fault, and can be blocked for doing so. WP:BRD details what users should do instead of edit warring. I would add that I am also not a fan of responding to attempts to discuss things with rude emojis, that's certainly not helpful. I would urge you both to discuss this matter at Talk:Elevations RTC. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HiRachel420, it seems that the ElevationsRTC content you keep trying to put on the page would be better suited somewhere else, perhaps on Paris Hilton's page or pages for the other people and companies you mention. The articles you keep citing to have nothing to do with Elevations RTC. Farr4h2004 (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elevations RTC have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Elevations RTC was changed by HiRachel420 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861786 on 2022-02-02T06:18:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Elevations RTC. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 15:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

👑

Changes are irrefutable; gaslighting (the denial of reality and facts) is a commonly used tactic within this industry. It seems as though this tactic is being employed by the users that continue changing the changes I’ve made and have fraudulently reported me for vandalism when they are guilty of that accusation. It would be massively corrupt for one employed within the industry to be making edits to this page. Thanks 💁🏻‍♀️ HiRachel420 (talk) 12:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are POV-pushing info which has little, if anything, to do with Elevations RTC. Please stop. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are now blocked from editing the article. You should have sought the article talk page a long time ago, for discussing the merits of your edits. Drmies (talk)

I will be reporting all of you who are choosing to engage in censorship, likely due to a conflict of interest because of financial interest in the facility in question and/or it’s parent companies. This is unlawful, please respect the first amendment. HiRachel420 (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be very careful with the legal threats.Wikipedia takes a very dim view of such things. And maybe try actually reading all the things people have been trying to tell you. An article on one specific school is obviously not the appropriate place to add extended content about Paris Hilton or a movement she is involved with. That's not censorship. Wikipedia is also an encyclopedia, not an forum or a free-for-all. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nor a WP:SOAPBOX, for that matter. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elevations RTC

No threats of any type were made, all usernames have been noted and the appropriate reports will follow. Anyone engaging in censorship over this topic is likely protecting those who have created a “movement” to spread propaganda on behalf of the privet equity company which provided funding for the facility the wiki page is about. Someone who went to the program editing the page is much less of a conflict of interest than someone working for the program and/or it’s parent companies. HiRachel420 (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See, "the appropriate reports will follow" comes off as a threat. Reports to who, exactly? Who do you think regulates content on a private encyclopedia website? I can tell you the answer: the community here does that, and nobody else. Most Wikipedia editors do not have any connection whatsoever to the subjects they edit about, that's actually considered optimal. I certainly don't have any connection to this topic other than an interest in wanting our coverage to maintain a neutral point of view and accurately reflect what has already been reported in reliable sources. You're coming in here as new user and trying to dictate your own rules, but this is a collaborative project and it just doesn't work like that. I would advise you to take some time to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is and how it works before proceeding with more editing, and that you stop threatening to report people without being clear about what it is you are talking about. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was not wise. Now you've left basically no choice but to fully block both accounts, as you used a sock account to harass another user. I don't know why it is so hard for you to understand that discussion and consensus are the primary means of decision making here, but they are, and Wikipedia does not allow the abusive use of multiple accounts. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

strugglingteens.com as a source

we noticed your have some knowledge regarding the various troubled teens industry pages and sourcing. I've been trying to bring balance to the articles, but am having trouble resolving the use of attack blogs and various crusade original research sites. any help you are inclined to give would be appreciated. I'm frustrated and am stepping back to research policy. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)