User talk:HexenX

Hello HexenX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! --Benjaminstewart05 08:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Chrono Trigger and Return to Zork

Those are in fact, both great games, and if you've figured that out at the tender age of 16, you're farther along in life than most :)

I wrote a strategywiki for Chrono Trigger because I wasn't satisfied with any of the current guides by the way: http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Chrono_Trigger

And a notebook guide for return to zork: http://db.gamefaqs.com/computer/doswin/file/return_to_zork_notebook.txt (cut and paste) It's actually incomplete since I'm not totally sure where one of the comments come from.

But yeah, I enjoy both quality RPGs and adventure games, try out the Quest for Glory Series and the Monkey Island series as far as Adventure Games go, and Super Mario RPG and the Paper Mario games are fun RPGs, more action oriented than story though.--BigCow 09:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as for consoles, I've got a Wii at the moment. It's fun for minigames and playing with other people who aren't serious gamers, and it let me catch up on the library of GameCube games. I've been a PC game for a while though, playing adventure games, the Max Payne series and so on. No World of Warcraft yet though, I have a hard enough time playing games that I can actually beat after spending enough time on them!--BigCow 20:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you added a {{lowercase}} tag to old humans. Could you please answer my question on its talk page? If the article's title should be lowercase, shouldn't the last sentence (which starts "Old humans") start with a lowercase letter? Thanks for your time, Storkk (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Geomancer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Geomancer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello HexenX! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 8 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Adrian Huge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HexenX. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Tower on the Rift moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Tower on the Rift, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dark is the Moon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dark is the Moon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 13:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Way Between the Worlds moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Way Between the Worlds, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 13:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Three Worlds Cycle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Three Worlds Cycle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Three Worlds Cycle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ovinus (talk) 20:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Geomancer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Geomancer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]