Jump to content

User talk:Hermannnn21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

about ronald

[edit]

explain to me how ronald being a happy clown is not legit. isn't he not? And might i suggest you change your name because when ever i say it i have to form a big ball of phlem or mucus to pronouce it correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermannnn21 (talkcontribs) 01:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's g-s-c-shoyru. (letter, letter, letter, word). And the fact that he's happy is your own POV. Can you WP:CITE a verifiable, reliable source that says so? If not, you can't add it.
Also, you're violating the blocking policy by creating a new account after being blocked. See WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK Gscshoyru 01:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
According to the world book encyclopedia 2003, it says, and you can verify it yourself, that "he is characterized with extreme happyness, which reverberates upon the children he encounters. . ." I left that epilipses there because it was not a end sentence. Please respond, I can site, and if this encylopedia is licit in any shape or form, I should be priviledged to provide that factotum.
Oh yeah, and this is not a new account, I am simpily with my accomplice and we happen to share very identical ideologys. Please don't make presumptions, fore its not an acedemically desired idiosyncrasie.
Really? In an encyclopedia? Shame on it. That still doesn't fit into the policies of WP:V and WP:RS, however -- we cite secondary sources, and that's a tertiary source. Perhaps you could use what the encyclopedia is sourcing to say that?
And this is a new account -- I can see that here Gscshoyru 01:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]