User talk:Henrytheantman

You all have no clue about anything.

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ton was changed by Henrytheantman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96596 on 2012-08-28T20:33:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ton. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I have a reliable source. That reliable source is living in the UKItalic text.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Ton with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Henrytheantman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Granted, the first time was vandalism. But all I was trying to do after that was correct something that was wrong. 'Tonne' is pronounced 'ton' in the UK. I live here and I have never - AND I MEAN NEVER - heard ANYONE say 'tonneh'. This is a falsehood and I was making the page truthful. Also, I was given a warning that I would be blocked if I made any more 'disruptive' edits. I did not make ANY more edits and then I was blocked. And I think you'l find that my final edit was keeping in terms with the article and was in no way offensive, nor was it vandalism. It was simply true. Henrytheantman (talk) 20:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were removing reliably referenced information, and acted combative when confronted about your edits here. While your personal experience may disagree with the information in the article, we have reliable sources (one of them arguably one of the most reliable when it comes to pronunciation and definition of words, the OED) to back that information up. Wikipedia's goal is verifiability, something which is much easier to attain than universal truth. Keep in mind also that unless you've personally heard everyone in the UK say the word "tonne", you cannot extrapolate your experience to the entire country. The UK, much like the US and many other countries, has a number of more localized dialects and/or accents that may pronounce words differently. If you disagree with something in an article, especially when the information is supported by a reference, you should discuss with other editors the issue, find a reliable source to back up your view, and together come to a consensus on how to proceed.

In any event, this unblock request - and your attempts to fake acceptance as noted below - do not convince me that you will not continue to edit unconstructively. I would encourage you to consider what I've said, read through the various pages I've linked to, and try to understand how Wikipedia functions before appealing again. In your next appeal, please address what actions you will take if you should encounter a similar situation again. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 21:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not add your own faked unblock acceptances - it's an abuse of this talk page and could lose you the ability to edit even here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also live in the UK and concur with your comment regarding pronunciation, although looking at the edit in question it seems to me to suggest that the "e" is not pronounced. Had you not inserted a spurious unblock acceptance template, which is deleted but remains accessible, I would have been minded to urge unblock. As it is, you will need to give a compelling reason for your insertion of that template.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I too agree that this editor may have a point but has gone about it in entirely the wrong way. I am going to open a thread on the article talk page, perhaps Henrytheantman will join in when he is unblocked. Hopefully Henrytheantman's mistakes are merely due to being new here and he can now understand that discussion should come first. Spinning Spark 10:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but his block is indefinite. Henry, please ewnter a really convincing comment here. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hah hah hah haaah. I made spelling errors because I was really, really, really angry and was typing quickly. That's just petty to correct them. And I'm not actually new. I just haven't had an account in years. I know fine well the protocol for editing Wikipedia, I was just making mischief because Wikipedians are a bunch of anally retentive weirdos who seem to think keeping this correct is the be all and end all to the safety of the planet. Also, don't talk on MY OWN TALK PAGE about me as if it's not MY OWN TALK PAGE. And my name isn't Henry. The account name is just a reference to the Marvel character Henry Pym. Look, I don't even care any more. People need to a) lighten up and b) accept that someone who LIVES IN THE COUNTRY knows how things are pronounced there. And accept that my change to the article wasn't actually vandalism when I got round to changing it properly.

If I was to put a convincing argument it would be that I am from the UK and know how tonne is pronounced. And the article did state that the 'e' was pronounced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrytheantman (talk • contribs) 20:11, 29 August 2012‎

Do not change other people's comments, please - I have reverted your change to Spinningspark's comment, above. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]