User talk:Hemantvavale

November 2013

Hello, I'm Enric Naval. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Indian campaign of Alexander the Great, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please see the difference between primary sources like Arrian and secondary sources like modern history books.

Also, you seem to be picking isolated facts from ancient sources, and narrating whole narratives that connect them. Those narratives are unsourced. Some of your statements seem to be unsourced, for example:

"The name of the place is 'Kadee'"
"in the course of fighting he (Porus's son) wounded Alexander with his own hand and struck the blow which killed his beloved horse Buccaphalus."

Other statements are conclusions that should be taken from secondary sources. For example:

"there isn't any mention in any account that Porus' son was killed. "
"By looking at the above write up by Greek writers it is sure that Alexander was willing to have treaty to be done to avoid further damage to his side. The same writers don't write in exact words wheather Alexander really won and Porus lost the war"

In one place you cite the source "Cambridge-Ancient History Pt.IV,P.40", is it the 1928 edition? That source is too old. Historiography has advanced a lot since the start of century XX, and many accounts have been corrected to fit new data discovered. Try to cite more recent sources.

Arrian and other ancient historians have gaps, omissions and biases. It's better to take the interpretations made by modern reliable sources who have studied the subject in depth and can analyze the accounts in context.

You also cite "Rogers, p.200", You need to add more details, such as title of the book, full name of author, publisher company, ISBN, page number.

Also, all the text seems to be oriented towards glorifying Porus by picking quotes, instead of making a balanced account, and narrating how each king seemed to feel about each other, according to conclusions made by modern sources. Enric Naval (talk) 11:26, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Melonkelon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Indian campaign of Alexander the Great because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Melonkelon (talk) 04:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Hemantvavale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BigDwiki (talk) 06:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camping near Pune

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camping near Pune, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. In veritas (talk) 05:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nisargshala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nisargshala, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 10:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 10:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]