User talk:Helpingothers1234

November 2024

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that in this edit to Tyler Chapa, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Tyler Chapa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Tyler Chapa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have reverted a content more than 3 times in the last 24 hours, possibly breaking the WP:3RR rule. More reverts from you without discussion/consensus can result in you getting blocked. You are attempting to remove his criminal history, which is not allowed as his history is sourced and referenced well. Please refrain from doing such things. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Helpingothers1234 reported by User:SunDawn (Result: ). Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Tyler Chapa. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 02:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]