User talk:HelpingOut61

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia...

...

Welcome!

Hello, HelpingOut61, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Haď Čarém, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reo ⁺ 17:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haď Čarém

The article Haď Čarém has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is well constructed fabrication on a topic of non-existent historical figure from Czech history. In short:the sources are phoney, topic is made-up. Article fabricated. It is well written with all criteria of verifiability seemingly fulfilled. However, not only the historical figure is not only highly unlikely to exist. No Google hits in czech or english sources (except from few that adapted it from here). Not only, no History specialist asked, new about it. It is based on MADE-UP sources. Unfortunately all of the mentioned sources are allegedly written only, only in czech and of old date - unverifiable through internet - and that made some space for the article to be unchallenged. However discussion was held with Czech Wikipedians on a Facebook (in czech) : https://www.facebook.com/jiri.ohlidal/posts/10204319763892665?notif_t=like and one Czech Colleagues had visited library and had checked the content of journal with volumes and pages given. Articles in that journal at the year, volume and pages held totylly different article from different author on different topic - Ceský Casopis Historicky Vol. 39 (1933), Praha, pp. 40–57 article by Evžen Stein: Mistr Jindřich z Bitterfeldu, and article by Jan Klepl: Královská města česká počátkem 18. stol. One of many suspicious moment leading to this challenge is unexpected accurateness for such supposedly old figure of Czech significance, from the times where, even the contemporary and saint Czech Duke is documented scarcely and mostly subject of legends and just few sources. This Haď Čarém on the other hand - we supposedly even know his Arabic name, even his Arabic transliteration, coupled with surprisingly well detailed biography and personal info - all based on those few historical paper sources from the beginning of 20th century, now challenged and no other newer sources and no original sources. While other figures of importance of the time of comparable importance to alleged Haď Čarém are having very vague description (Yet it is still possible to google them) The sources are phoney, topic is made-up. Article fabricated

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Reo ⁺ 17:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]