User talk:Hell Theater

Few days ago we were emailed by Mr. Tamsing Kelly that someone has written a page about HELL THEATER: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Hell_Theater

We double checked everything, and it's a very good job, we would add information but prefer to keep it as it is, without risks to add information not under Wikipedia policy. Just updated few things and cut a couple of broken links.

Mr. Tamsin Kelly, wrote to our management@helltheater.com email:

"I am an experienced Wikipedian. I will do online research and rewrite the content in encyclopedic tone, format the draft according to Wikipedia guidelines and get it approved, I will forward the final draft for you to review before submitting. Please respond for more details." We answered, "it sounds good, please proceed, thank you !"

Then we were asked to pay 150$ as soon as the page was published and approved... so we declined the offer immediately.

We don't know whether this is compliant to Wikipedia community rules, please someone give some idea.

We confirm we represent entirely ALL RIGHTS regarding HELL THEATER and we allow the publishing of this page as it appear now. We would like to add some image (we can give the full rights to publish them in Wikipedia), please give some hint

Hell Theater (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC) Alessandro Girardi (Alex Septem)[reply]

    HELL THEATER's manager
    management@helltheater.com

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hell Theater (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still seems to rely heavily on fansites and blogs, rather than quality journalistic sources (or proof of any chart success)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hell Theater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 22:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hell Theater

Hello, Hell Theater. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hell Theater".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]