User talk:HectorSo1333

Welcome!

Hello, HectorSo1333, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:HectorSo1333/sandbox/My updated True Enlightenment Education Foundation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 07:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Adminstrator, Thank you for kind advice. I really learn a good lesson being a normal wiki editor I'm trying. I'm planning to write my draft on MS Word before moving to a Wikipedia page. This may help me to eliminate my mistakes that I made before. Thank you very much. Sincerely, HectorSo1333 (talk) 03:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)hectorSo1333[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HectorSo1333 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I mistakenly treated the page under the sub-directory of Sandbox as my trial and error area, so I made such a big mistake. I'm a retired health provider living on my SSI in Corona, CA. I respect Wikipedia is a very valuable dictionary for the whole world just like I respect the life of every patient I worked with in the past. Please forgive me. HectorSo1333 (talk) 21:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are actually blocked for undisclosed paid editing. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HectorSo1333 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never get paid for editing a Wiki page. The reason I write something useful on Wikipedia is that I want everyone can be benefitted from my experience. I'm a person willing to provide good information for general public. If you still treat me like a personal making profit from editing a Wiki page, I would not say anything because this is people's choice; in fact, I DONNOT make any money at all; I work for people who appreciate my knowledge and experience. However, I truly believe that if I helped people understanding something they are not familiar with, I would be very happy; believe or not, such happiness will be my reward. Since I have enough money for my retirement plan and I'm a health practitioner that I know how to take care myself and my family plus my friends, I do not need to make additional income for my retirement fortunately. But I feel sorry that whatever I did make people having a thought in their mind that I'm making my fortune; up to this moment, I tell people again I'm not making any money from editing; I wish I can give people my experience as well as happiness; when people feel happiness with my information, it will become my reward. Thank you for reading my statements.HectorSo1333 (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No responses for a month, so editor seems likely to have disengaged with this process. Feel free to open a new unblock request if you subsequently agree with the restrictions mentioned below. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. It seems that you and several other editors are repeatedly trying to create an article on a non-notable Buddhist centre. These articles have the usual paid editing signs such as extensive non-notable references and text that reads like puffery. I note you insist you are not a paid editor, but even if this is true you very clearly have some kind of close association with this Centre and are likely to have a conflict of interest in writing about it.

I have pinged the blocking administrator to get their views, but suggest your only possible path to an unblock is to:

agree to abide by WP:COI and not write about subjects with which you have a close association. That includes this Buddhist Centre.
make no other edits on any topic that might reasonably appear to be a paid promotion
declare any actual paid editing per WP:PAID.

Note that this is just a suggestion: the blocking administrator would also need to agree to an unblock under these conditions. If they do not agree then this unblock appeal will be declined. But as a starting point, your views are welcome on this suggestion. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Euryalus, thanks for ping. I think your analysis is spot on. Paid or not, there are several obvious COI editors working on this blatant promo with little sign of interest in the rest of the project. I have no objections to an unblock on the terms that you have offered. I should make it clear that any editor recreating this article in a similarly POV way is also likely to be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jimfbleak. HectorSo1333, your views welcome on the above requirements. -- Euryalus (talk) 18:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:HectorSo1333/sandbox/My updated True Enlightenment Education Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:HectorSo1333/sandbox/My updated True Enlightenment Education Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 07:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Administrator AssumeGoodWraith, It is my problem that I mistakenly tried to use the page under the sub-direction Sandbox as a testing place for my draft. This is my misunderstanding about the operation of editing a Wiki page. I learned my mistake not to remove the information before I obtain a permission from Wiki administrators. Anyway, thank you for your advice. I give up the previous page because I have my personal copy; I'll do my best to contribute my experience to Wikipedia in near future if I'm allowed to do it again. Thank you again. Sincerely, HectorSo1333 (talk) 04:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)HectorSo1333[reply]