User talk:HealthEdActivist

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morgan Pigg (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

notable , but avoid terms of praise of excellence. Give a list of his 4 or 5 most highlly cited papers, with citation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morgan Pigg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Morgan Pigg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HealthEdActivist! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you'd like to connect with other Wikipedia editors, please consider joining a WP:WikiProject. A WikiProject is a group of editors that want to work together to improve Wikipedia's contents. You might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's Health, or Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine. The "Talk" pages for the groups are where people ask questions and discuss ideas. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morgan Pigg has been accepted

Morgan Pigg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 03:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eta Sigma Gamma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eta Sigma Gamma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eta Sigma Gamma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HealthEdActivist. I'm an experienced editor (a relative term), who has worked on a number of Fraternity and Sorority pages. I noticed your fine draft Eta Sigma Gamma page. Because we aim to track, list and tidy up all the various fraternities, sororities and societies, after cleaning up and improving its formatting to match other similar groups I promoted the page you wrote to mainspace as an article. Thank you for starting this.

But alas, you may have already seen that another editor nominated it for deletion. I find his/her decision to do so unsupportable and inconsistent with WP practice, as yours is a fine article, still being improved. But that's their choice. YOU have a choice too, and even though you may have a conflict of interest you may vote either way on the proposed deletion by clicking the link above (the deletion discussion is also linked at the top of the Eta Sigma Gamma article page). I'm not of course advocating how you vote, but just that you should be aware that you can vote. Place your vote at the beginning of a new line, after a colon to properly indent it. Bold the word "Keep", or "Delete", "Merge", "Draftify", "Comment" or any of the other choices you prefer. And you are welcome to join the Fraternities and Sororities project to assist us with other articles. Jax MN (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]