User talk:Headzred
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
|
Licensing of images
[edit]What is your question about Image:IMG 2751cii.jpg? (Also, it would be best to change the title of the image to something more descriptive). —Centrx→talk • 18:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I merely cropped borders off an image already uploaded to Wikipedia, licensing info was there, etc. Now I am unable to upload the edited image without giving it an all new GNU. This doesn't seem right, as I didn't create the image, just took off some unnecessary borders. What should I have done?Headzred 18:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
The uploading mechanism just has some standard licenses that it shows, which discourage people from uploading images for which they do not hold the copyright. You can change the license after uploading by editing the page, so you can replace what is there now with {{GFDL}} and {{cc-by-2.5}} if you do not want it to say "I, the copyright holder...". It doesn't matter much, because the original copyright holder did release it under these licenses. —Centrx→talk • 20:42, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
I'd like some help with redirects. A query for erythrocyte should redirect to Red blood cell, but it doesn't right now. I can't seem to locate the code for that. It's probably right under my nose. TIA Headzred 16:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- It seems that it already redirects there. –Animum 16:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Okay, I stand corrected. There was something I thought should redirect there, but beats me what it was. In case my brain rescues that thought later, I'd still like to know how.Headzred 16:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- To redirect a page, just type:
#REDIRECT [[NAME OF TARGET PAGE]]
on the page you want to redirect. See more information about redirecting here. Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 16:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:DowntownVenice.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:DowntownVenice.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Puss in boots2.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Puss in boots2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Highwayblood2a.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Highwayblood2a.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:IMG 2751cii.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Image:IMG 2751cii.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:IMG 2751cii.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
You know, content would be improved if it wasn't so darned difficult to do something simple.
[edit]The activity on my user page concerning a photo I edited some borders from should illustrate this point.
I have some content that I feel would be useful to put on wikipedia. I have good, published documentation. And I would like to put up pictures--photos TAKEN BY ME. Before I go to all that trouble, I would surely love to assure that they won't get speedily deleted due to someone saying the creator can't be verified or some other silly thing. Headzred (talk) 04:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- I responded to your copy of the above which you posted at the New Contributor's page, but didn't realize you had already tried to upload images, and had problems. Your post made it sound like you wanted to ask about it before trying it. Sorry you're having problems, and I can't comment on the images mentioned above on this page, because they have already been deleted, and I can't see them. But as has been stated, you need to add the appropriate copyright tag declaring the images to be your own work. It's a bit tricky doing this the first time, but after you've done it, you can just copy from previous images you uploaded. I agree that the process is awkward. I have uploaded pictures myself, and thought I had added all the necesary tags, but then got messages like the ones you got. You need to check back a few hours after uploading, to see if you get any messages. That's all I can suggest. Anyway, it CAN be done, so give it another try! --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)