This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
I finally finished with all the revisions so check it out. I am happy with the way it turned out this time around. I feel as though it is more of an encyclopedia article rather than a narrative and it just seems to be a much better article all around. Here's hoping for a better response! Hbarton3 (talk) 01:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Christopher Baker:
1. Quality of Information: 2 2. Article size:2 3. Readability:2 4. Refs:2 5. Links:2 6. Responsive to comments:2 7. Formatting:1 (I suggest breaking up the Charlotte Figi section into different stages in order to make it easier to read) 8. Writing: 2 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2 10. Outstanding:1 (In order to improve the article, I would find more examples or related successes. However, I can understand if there isn't much out there.)
Total: 18 out of 20
Christopherjbaker1993 (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback and great score! I am glad you liked my page.
To any others who have been following this page I am sure you know I ran into some trouble. A certain Wikipedia user found my article to be sub par and deleted it. Their reasoning was harsh and did not give me much room to make corrections. Their main concern was that they felt as though there isn't enough information and research being done in this field and that it should remain as a very brief section on the cannabidiol page. I have and will continue to work on the problems they found. One of their complains (which I do somewhat agree) deals with the Charlotte Figi section. They say it isn't written in encyclopedia format and that it is too much like a narrative. Again I am working on fixing this.Hbarton3 (talk) 23:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
