User talk:Hayleybox00

Your article

Hi there! Unfortunately, the article that you were writing fell afoul of our Criteria for Speedy Deletion, specifically A7 which states that a subject must show it's significance to be included.

However, as I see that you are working on it, I didn't want to delete it! You can find your article here where you can work on it in peace until it's ready to go into Main Space. I would also recommend that you submit your article to our Article for Creation team, who can help you tweak the article to make it the best it can be.

Good luck and happy editing! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Petite meller

Hello Hayleybox00,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Petite meller for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 14:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katy towell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katy towell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Picnic (2004 film)

Hello Hayleybox00,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Picnic (2004 film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 14:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katy Towell

Hello Hayleybox00,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Katy Towell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 14:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Picnic (2004 film)

The article Picnic (2004 film) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Donottroll (talk) 17:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lisa burns

The article Lisa burns has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for this specific type of article, you may want to check out our criterion for biographies, specifically the section WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Picnic (2004 film)

Hello Hayleybox00,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Picnic (2004 film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 12:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

No one is going to be followed by you adding a fake good article template to your articles. Stuff like that can get you blocked.*Treker (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katy towel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katy towel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 15:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I appreciate your enthusiasm and that you are not adding defamatory, hoax, or nonsense article - but you've been spoken to repeatedly now and you don't appear to be adjusting your behaviour. Please take a look at your editing patterns and consider what could be done to improve your contributions. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sybil Jason. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisa Burns

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lisa Burns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Opencooper (talk) 13:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louise Burns (child actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Louise Burns (child actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Opencooper (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop recreating articles

You think just because you will try again no one will notice or the articles will somehow be allowed now? They've been deleted multiple times before for not meeting our notability guidelines yet you keep recreating them with the same content. Cease immediately or else the page titles will be creation protected and you will be blocked for disruptive editing. WIkipedia is not a battleground and you should take the time to familiarize yourself with our notability policies. Opencooper (talk) 13:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone should familiarize himself with our actual deletion guidelines. There's nothing wrong with trying to write an article on a potentially eligible subject just because a prior version was A7-d. Rather than threatening a good faith editor who's been here only a few weeks, you ought to help them work on article improvement. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is. If all you do is recreate an exact replica of an article that was speedy deleted multiple times, you're just editing disruptively. It's edit warring but for page creations. And I did assume good faith, that's why I'm telling them to familiarize themselves with our notability guidelines, which were also linked in all of the deletion templates on their page. Maybe you should assume good faith on my assuming good faith on them, huh? Opencooper (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Burns for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Opencooper (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've update your block to indefinite as you are very clearly evading your block of User:Hayley308. You cannot edit under any account or IP as long as your original account remains blocked. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]