User talk:Haxz.999

Haxz.999, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Haxz.999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haxz islam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haxz islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JZ CL 16:48, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Myspace or Facebook for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Five pillars and the WP:Welcome page; also, I think you should read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Mr Stephen (talk) 20:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, John Cena (WWE Wrestler)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, John Cena (WWE Wrestler). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – John Cena. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at John Cena – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Sarahj2107 (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John Cena (WWE Wrestler) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widr (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at CM Punk, you may be blocked from editing. Papacha (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at CM Punk, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Amir Khan WBA.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Amir Khan WBA.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Garcia WBC WBA The Ring.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Garcia WBC WBA The Ring.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Undisputed Title.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Undisputed Title.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Kendall Holt WBO.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kendall Holt WBO.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Peterson IBF.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Peterson IBF.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWE Brahma Bull Sideplates.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWE Brahma Bull Sideplates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:AJ Styles 2013.png

Thanks for uploading File:AJ Styles 2013.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Julio Diaz IBF.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Julio Diaz IBF.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Molina WBO Intercontinental Champion.png

Thanks for uploading File:Molina WBO Intercontinental Champion.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content

Please read Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. We may not use non-free images unless they meet these criteria. Mr Stephen (talk) 16:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:AJ Styles 2013.png)

Thanks for uploading File:AJ Styles 2013.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Mark LoMonaco / Brooke Hogan

These people are not married. Please stop making nonsense edits. McPhail (talk) 22:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Bangladesh

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Himmel7 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WWE "LOGO" Championship.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WWE "LOGO" Championship.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

TNA X Division Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eric Young

WXw Unified World Wrestling Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to WXw

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Money in the Bank (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Money in the Bank (2013). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Richard BB 19:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amrit Manthan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Nimrit Agam Malik ''nee Sodhi'' (Before Plastic Surgery) / Rajkumari Shivangi Tej Malik ''nee Sodhi) (Nimrit's twin-sister) || [[Dimple Jhangiani]] || ''Nimrit:'' Ex- Main Female Lead and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Burnham Park and Wexham

Hi there. Firstly, any school thats an academy is NOT in ANY LEA, they are independent. If you dont believe me, take a look at Template:Infobox UK school - It says there not to add an LEA if the school is an academy.

Secondly the stuff about Wexham School... Its the info you added about the pupil that got expelled which cant go in UNLESS you have a source to prove it. Any statement which is cotraversial (and this is) must be not be added unless it has a reference.

So please stop adding the LEAs and stop adding unsourced stuff. If you continue to do so I will move to get you blocked for disruptive editing. Bleaney (talk) 13:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I have proof they have a new website you can check on the Wexham Page but It is not fully updated until 5th September.

Wait until the reference is published, and only include stuff that the reference mentions - No names unless the reference says them! But good... Happy editing ;) Bleaney (talk) 14:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FullImpactPro.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FullImpactPro.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Full Impact Pro Wrestling.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Full Impact Pro Wrestling.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:LangleyAcademy.png

Thanks for uploading File:LangleyAcademy.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I totally Own this picture and I put it as the Langley Academy Cover.

Please stop copying images from websites

Possibly unfree File:WexhamNewLogo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WexhamNewLogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:WexhamNewLogo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WexhamNewLogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

I own this picture and It is the new logo of Wexham School Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:St. Joseph Catholic High School.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:St. Joseph Catholic High School.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

I own this picture I know It is not very clear but oh well it is the logo of the title of the png itself Thank You.

Possibly unfree File:WestgateSchool.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WestgateSchool.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

It is my picture I own it and it is the logo of westgate school thank you.

Mr Stephen (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You do not gain ownership of an image by copying it. Please stop. Mr Stephen (talk) 19:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WexhamNewLogo.png

A tag has been placed on File:WexhamNewLogo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LangleyAcademy.png

A tag has been placed on File:LangleyAcademy.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Park Federation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Park Federation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jameselliman.slough.sch.uk/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr Stephen (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected

I have declined the nominator's speedy deletion because the article is no longer promotional. However, the subject of the article does not comply with our criteria for Notability for Organisations and General Notability Guidelines and has been redirected to the article about its locality where the school is mentioned. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You (Haxz.999) replaced text copied from the school's webpage with some more text copied from the Ofsted report. Once again, other people's text and images are not yours or Wikipedia's to help themselves to. Please stop copying copyright material from other places. Mr Stephen (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:WexhamNewLogo2.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WexhamNewLogo2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primo & Epico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Colón (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Carlos Molina Training.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Carlos Molina Training.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, you are trying to use copyright material and pass it off as your own. You wrote at File:Carlos Molina Training.jpg "I screenshot the image when I paused a video of Carlos Molina Training so I completely own the image of him." No, you do not own the image, it belongs to the copyright owner of the film. Please stop doing this, it is not helpful or legal. Mr Stephen (talk) 10:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ryback, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 15:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Curtis Axel, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 16:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Curtis Axel. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 18:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OKAY HE IS SORRY!

Do you mind telling me why you keep reverting the edits to the world title article?KingMorpheus (talk) 04:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The World Heavyweight title has been unified with the WWE title and you KEEP on editing the World Heavyweight title is retired No it is not and it has not been announced retired from the WWE so at tomorrow night at WWE RAW if you don't see the World title with Orton then you can say it is retired but it is Unified don't you get it, it has not been announced so leave my edit just the way it is until tomorrow night then we will see who is right and wrong it is to be announced.

Jasper

Please, stop. Wikipedia doesn't work like that. If a wrestler hasn't an article, the solution isn't link him to a user page. Also, the user page hasn't sources. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It has all the information about him I never made this article with a user on it so will you please rename the page as Jasper Orton because it's an article about him with a name "User:JasperOrtonFans".

It's not an article, is an user page. Also, Jasper isn't notable. The article hasn't sources and we are talking about a man how doesn't make his debut. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand but can you convert the user page to an article and you can check the article again now I have edited it. Or may I create an article about Jasper Orton and copy and paste from the user page?

You can create an article, but it needs to have reliable sources showing how Jasper Orton is notable. All this guy seems to have going is being Randy's cousin, and notability is not inheritable. I think it'd be a waste of time, for now. He'll probably be famous one day. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... True that Okay I will wait till he debuts for NXT Wrestling and then I will make it.

please sign your posts?

Like the header says, you can sign your posts on Wiki, and it's better as everyone will know who posted that particular post. Just type ~~~~ at the end of your post. Thanks. Starship.paint (talk) 05:38, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monica Khanna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Farnaz Shetty (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Farnaz Shetty.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bray Wyatt, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 07:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vishal Vashishtha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vishal Vashishtha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never fucking make the fucking article in the first place what the fuck?

I NEVER FUCKING MADE THIS MOTHER FUCKING ARTICLE I JUST FUCKING EDITED IT AND THAT WAS A FUCKING LONG TIME AGO FUCKING ASSHOLES! PISSING ME OFF :@ Haxz.999 (talk) 20:24, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Shield (professional wrestling). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 22:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Bryan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 03:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for editing disruptively by continuing to add unsourced content after warnings to stop. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Authority (professional wrestling), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 04:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Haxz.999. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 05:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kane_(wrestler), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 06:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at CM Punk, you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 05:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC) etc CM Punk DID adopt the GO TO SLEEP from KENTA fuking hell! KENTA invented the move CM Punk ADOPTED IT from him GET YOUR BLOODY FACTS RIGHT! you're fuking abusing your power for no reason AND YOU FUKING think you know more wrestling than me just leave me the FUK alone PLEASE!!!! 08:18am[reply]

AND PLEASE DO SOME RESEARCHING ON GOOGLE AND GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT BEFORE YOU WARN ME BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU'RE ALL THAT BY JUST DOING IT DO YOU KNOW WHATS THAT CALLED? ITS CALLED ABUSIVE POWER IN CASE YOU DIDNT KNOW! 08:22am

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at CM Punk. STATic message me! 15:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will you do me a favour and just fuk off! 21:00

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Haxz.999. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Richard BB 21:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silas Young, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Green Bay, Lethal and Gowen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Silas Young

Your article at Silas Young needed a lot more work before it was ready for article space. I have moved it to User:Haxz.999/Silas Young, where you can improve it. I suggest you start by pulling all the references in from the French article. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding WrestleMania 31 edits.

Calling me a dumbass and suggesting I have power is insane. I am not an administrator and I haven't sent an RfA. Furthermore. Yeah, I watch plenty of documentaries. Know a lot about math and law so how in the hell am I a dumbass. Also just be patient until WWE releases an official article. Thanks! TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dont give a crap about your rules, and yes you were acting like a dumbass by annoying me reverting the page, its official Daniel Bryan was added to the match now go take a walk and stay off my talk page.Haxz.999 (talk)

Recent edits on WrestleMania 31

Your recent editing history at WrestleMania 31 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to WrestleMania 31, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at WP:CITE and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit Warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of WP:3RR and possible edit warring on WrestleMania 31. The thread is available at [1]. Thank you. TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 01:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admittal of Idiocy

I do wish to genuinely apoligise for reverting your edits. This shouldn't occur again. As long as the source is something only the WWE could edit (Their official Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube or Website) then feel free to use them as references and if they revert your edits I'll revert theirs. Thanks and Best of luck in all future editing! TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 03:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for admitting you were wrong in reverting my edits because I was actually getting pissed off by your actions, I am sorry for snapping at you and calling you a 'dumbass' we did have a misunderstanding and we will just forgive and forget. :) Haxz.999 (talk)

Don't worry. This wasn't the dumbest edit war I've been in... On the Hell's Kitchen (Season 12) page there was an issue when in the first episode a contestant quit and later on another left mid-service and there was a war over what COLOUR to make the box for leaving and quitting. Dumbest edit war I've been in so far. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 03:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kenta Kobayashi. Human3015 knock knock • 23:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article moves

You're going to have to request a move on a lot of these articles. Some of them are controversial and will require discussion to gain consensus. Just because they are performing under new names doesn't necessarily mean they should be moved to a new name. Also, splitting the articles to their former redirects has a lot of negative side effects, such as losing article history, its wikidata item and therefore its interwiki links. Prefall 23:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: I'm sorry sir for abusing and breaching the site rules, I thought those who were undoing my edits were not admins so I kept reverting them, I will not repeat this mistake ever again in the future and I will learn more about how Wikipedia works. So may I be unblocked and get a second and last chance? Haxz.999 (talk) 02:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC) .[reply]

I'm sorry sir for abusing and breaching the site rules, I thought those who were undoing my edits were not admins so I kept reverting them, I will not repeat this mistake ever again in the future and I will learn more about how Wikipedia works. So may I be unblocked and get a second and last chance? Haxz.999 (talk) 02:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist (talk) 23:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Do not blank articles and redirect them to similar articles featuring a different name. You have to go through WP:RM and get them moved by consensus if the move is controversial... and all of these moves are controversial.LM2000 (talk) 23:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emerge Energy Drink.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emerge Energy Drink.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BOOST Energy Drink.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BOOST Energy Drink.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]