User talk:Hatman31

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glenn Brummer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Austin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Defensive spectrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan McMahon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jaleel Johnson

On Jaleel Johnson, you reverted my edits. I will find a source later on when there is a more reliable one, but go to https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/transactions/ and go to All Teams, choose NO and you will see it. ReaganHoang10 (talk) 05:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes and after that press update ReaganHoang10 (talk) 05:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Or an even better link without instructions https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/transactions/new-orleans-saints/defensive-tackle/signed/ ReaganHoang10 (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaganHoang10: I cannot emphasize enough that you need to read WP:SPORTSTRANS. That page should make it crystal clear to you that you should not be editing pages to reflect transactions that have not been announced by official sources (no, I don't believe Spotrac counts). Hatman31 (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Falsely accusing me of vandalism

First of all Chris myarick was on the practice squad when the bengals won the Super Bowl therefore he won a Super Bowl. secondly it was announced per his agent that he signed with the giants MonkeyMan8013 (talk) 21:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MonkeyMan8013: First of all, "when the Bengals won the Super Bowl"? You're fucking with me, right?

Second of all, stating that a player has signed with a team does not absolve you from having to provide a reference to substantiate that fact; please see WP:VERIFIABILITY (and perhaps WP:SPORTSTRANS. Hatman31 (talk) 23:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hatman31. Thank you for your work on He Gets Us. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating this article. I hope and encourage you to make more articles! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

klete keller

Hi, the lead on klete keller has been vandalized, not sure if anything can be done? thanks. 129.222.222.20 (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT Hatman31 (talk) 20:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how? I'm new at this. 2605:59C8:25AF:C410:9D36:5187:7252:71F0 (talk) 20:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very much not new to this. Hatman31, please disregard any requests from IPs or new accounts regarding the Klete Keller article.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American football players who died during their careers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ryan (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan McKenna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miles Routledge

Hello, I have noticed that you have removed a link I have added to the Miles Routledge Wikipedia page. The link isba video from Miles Routledge himself, where he was giving a direct account of his time in Afghanistan, for which reason, I felt it would work as the best source, better than any newspaper, about his time in there, as its directly his own words.

Hence, I think it should be added back. I am not adding it back as of yet, as I wanted to hear your opinion first. GucciNuzayer (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's necessary to include a link to the video in the article because there's already an external link to Routledge's YouTube channel, so if readers are curious about it, it's just a few clicks away already. If the video is included, it should be as an external link rather than embedded, per WP:NOTYOUTUBE. Hatman31 (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh okay, thank you GucciNuzayer (talk) 08:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SosMula Controversies Section

My man, the rapper in question is a semi-underground and barely mainstream guy. There's no way you'll find news articles or big rap blogs covering his every move. This doesn't mean we can't document his life as it goes on given what all we have of him, which mainly includes social media as that's the key way musicians stay in touch with the world and their fans now. You are really doing the most by deleting actual hard work consisting of careful info curation and neat packaging just because you want to adhere to a stone set rule for an encyclopedia site that has too many issues of its own. Just drop the issue and let the page display the info because it's all factual and necessary to paint the picture of his career till date. Life isn't perfect and we can't have a ScienceDirect article to back each sentence we type so just relax and stop deleting. But if you want to be unchill then you can I guess, usually everyone on this site is itching to delete info or revert people's edits. 2001:56A:F471:5500:E54C:3998:1B29:16E3 (talk) 09:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no way you'll find news articles or big rap blogs covering his every move. Yes, this is a great explanation of why he's not entitled to a Wikipedia article. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 18:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, what a way to nitpick one little line from all I said and use that as some AHA! Gotcha moment.

If I can google his name and see a whole array of things about him from over the years and the mark he's made in the music industry, then YES, he DOES deserve a Wikipedia article.

My point is that the super intricate details about his journey which won't get/somehow didn't get picked up by blogs (such as a heated back-and-forth on Instagram with another artist) but did get saved and archived by the fans, still deserve to get mentioned on his page. I even provided supporting links to the entire exchanges but you disregarded them outright.

You deleting that entire Controversies piece is simply censorship no matter how you coat it buddy. Use all the arbitrary rules and policies you want, but at the end of the day, that entire writeup was full of information about real events that did transpire and you deleting it whole just brought you one inch closer to embracing censorship. And I know you really want to embrace it fully with how you're suggesting that his page doesn't even need to exist in the first place so go ahead and embrace it, why not?

Just remember though - in days, weeks, months, and years from now, I will still be able to google SosMula and see all he's accomplished and the mark he made. But I'll google "Hatman31" and nothing but obscure wikipedia janitorial badges and digital accomplishments will pop up if even that.

Best to you in your future undo/delete/edit/omit/censor endeavors! 2001:56A:F471:5500:3CD8:DDF5:C148:4898 (talk) 18:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TL;DR Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 19:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPAs

Greetings, Hatman31, hope all is well in your world. I noticed that you removed the two SPA notices from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Murray (art historian), which I had placed to alert the closing administrator. I'm not upset whatsoever about your reversion, however, I want to explain why they were placed on that specific AfD, which I do not think was "inappropriate" as you had described them in your edit summaries. Gbaby99 showed up out of the blue with a total of 4 edits total, never having previously edited the article in question before today, the chances of a brand new editor finding an obscure AFD out of the blue is unusual to say the least (I'm speaking from the POV of someone who has been working at AfD consistently for many years. The other editor, Ninjafusion, has made a total of 28 edits total, and what is equally unusual, is not only have they never edited the article, they have not edited at all in the past 12 years except to vote at that AfD. I find this behavior questionable, which is why I added the SPA templates. Please explain your rationale as to why you felt the addition of the templates was "inappropriate" given the historical editing patterns of these two editors. BTW, just so you know, I don't do "drive by" tagging, I think things through before making such edits. Thank you in advance, and all the best, Netherzone (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Netherzone,

I don't disagree that the participation of those accounts is unusual, but I called the SPA tags inappropriate because each account's activity fits into a pattern that, according to WP:SPATG, should disqualify them from being tagged. I'm reasonably confident that the closing administrator will give those votes appropriate weight, but it would be fair to ask the accounts how they found the AFD. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 02:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]