Jump to content

User talk:Hasanovic26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chanta

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chanta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dumtar 19:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chanta is a certified Ismaili practice, the reliability of this article can be checked by contacting any Ismaili Jama'atkhana or Ismaili trust. Hasanovic26 20:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Hasanovic26 28 September 2007 21:21

The many stub articles were merged to the main article. Best, feydey 12:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And please do not copy copyrighted material from the internet (like http://www.cheraglibrary.org/morning.htm) to Wikipedia. feydey 12:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Namāz

[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Namāz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. -- Fullstop 22:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC) This prod-notice is obsolete. Article has been redirected. -- Fullstop 03:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dua Karavi

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dua Karavi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dumtar 14:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dasond

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dasond, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dumtar 14:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dua Karavi

[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Dua Karavi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. -- Aylahs (talk) 20:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Sufi Prayers

[edit]

Wikipedia tries to be a respectable encyclopedia and it does not include mere collections of public domain or other source material, they should go to wikibooks or wikisource. Best, feydey 20:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Salat (Universal Sufism)

[edit]

I have nominated Salat (Universal Sufism), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salat (Universal Sufism). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ناهد/(Nåhed) speak! 05:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prayer for Peace (Hazrat Inayat Khan), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://launchingpad.hypermart.net/Sufi/peace.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dowa(Universal Sufism), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sufiorder.toronto.on.ca/otherprayers.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prayer for the Dead, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://sufiatlanta.homestead.com/memoriam.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Saum (Universal Sufism), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.rosanna.com/sufiwritings/glossary/saum.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Khatum (Universal Sufism), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://launchingpad.hypermart.net/Sufi/khatum.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Prayer for Peace

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Prayer for Peace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 05:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sirkar Sufi Centre, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sufimovement.co.za/temple.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would You like to Help?

[edit]

Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the [[1]]. McKinseies (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Dhikr (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dhikr (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Dhikr (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Saum (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Saum (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Saum (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Salat (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Salat (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Salat (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Rasul (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rasul (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Rasul (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Nazar (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nazar (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Nazar (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Nabi (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nabi (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Nabi (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Invocation (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Invocation (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Invocation (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Dowa (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dowa (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Dowa (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Blessing (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blessing (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Blessing (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wazifa (Universal Sufism)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wazifa (Universal Sufism). Since you had some involvement with the Wazifa (Universal Sufism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ziraat" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ziraat. Since you had some involvement with the Ziraat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ryazat" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ryazat. Since you had some involvement with the Ryazat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Prayer for Peace in the World" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prayer for Peace in the World. Since you had some involvement with the Prayer for Peace in the World redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Prayer of Invocation" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prayer of Invocation. Since you had some involvement with the Prayer of Invocation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Prayer for the Universel" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prayer for the Universel. Since you had some involvement with the Prayer for the Universel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Chanto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

General notability not demonstrated according to the guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Journey of Learning (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chanto for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chanto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Journey of Learning (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Universal Worship Service has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Esoteric and hopelessly unencyclopedic material

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Universal Sufi Prayers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Esoteric and hopelessly unencyclopedic material

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 22:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universel for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 23:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Sufi Order Ināyati Silsila has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced solely to the corporate website of a religious movement without any secondary or reliable sources conveying notability. In any case, this material is based on the Nizami branch of the spiritual lineage of the Chishti Order and largely duplicates that material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]