User talk:Harry-fox

Welcome!

Hello, Harry-fox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Prolog 20:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Every time i try to write a new article or improve an existing article,it gets deleted within an hour about 80%of the time,so from now on i just wont make the effort to try and help you out,because my very many useful contributions have been unappreciated by the plonkers who run this site.

Notability of Sean fox

A tag has been placed on Sean fox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 18:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Btcc thruxton 2007

A tag has been placed on Btcc thruxton 2007, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ForeverDEAD 20:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jenni Davies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jenni Davies was changed by Harry-fox (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-25T09:34:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Japan

Before you add uncited material to the article, please gain consensus for your changes on the article's talk page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 14:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Beauchamp middle school

A tag has been placed on Beauchamp middle school requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hammer1980·^talk 16:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Brennan

Hi. Nice try, but I'm afraid your teacher is not notable just because she comes from Australia. Do you know that you don't have to create new articles every time? You can just make changes to articles that are already there about things you know about, eg. your favourite TV programme or hobby. Deb (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, and after me trying to help you too! I hope you're not going to carry on like this and get yourself banned from editing here. Deb (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jenni Davies

The one about Jenni Davies is easy to explain. The reversion was done by a bot, and I'm guessing they operate by looking for words such as "penis", which are often used by vandals and which you used in your contribution. But if you look at the page history, it explains what you should do about it.

The others I don't know about because you haven't specified which articles they are. I may or may not have been the one who deleted them, but I have to do so much deletion of unsuitable articles that, unless you tell me which ones they were, it's hard to say. You obviously know how to look at the deletion log. You need to also understand the rules about Wikipedia:Notability and I suggest you go from there to some of the other "help" pages that tell you how to produce good articles and carry out good edits. It would also help if you put something about yourself on your user page, then people will be able to see that you are a bona fide editor. Deb (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Well, I know you're young, but it would probably help if you did a bit of spelling and grammar-checking before you made your entries. You could write them in Word first, so that you could do a check, and then just cut and paste them. I say this because people may sometimes revert changes just because they aren't in good English. (People aren't really supposed to do that, but sometimes they will do it just because it is easier than making the improvements themselves.) In terms of sources, any published book is an acceptable source as long as you give the title and author. If you want to use a website as a source, it should be "reputable" - for example, not just somebody's personal website, but one set up by an organisation like a university or a professional body. Have a look at the page Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information.

The thing I'd like you to understand is that these complicated wikipedia "rules" have grown up because some people were abusing wikipedia and deliberately vandalising it. If you look at "Special:Newpages" any time, you will see lots of examples of this. Unfortunately, that means that a lot of more experienced contributors have to spend much of their time cleaning up, when they would prefer to be doing other things. The aim is to build an encyclopedia that is useful to people and doesn't contain any false information. I hope this helps. Deb (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St john's retail park,bedford

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article St john's retail park,bedford, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of St john's retail park,bedford. ukexpat (talk) 21:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I object to the tone of your message on my talk page. Your incivility was totally unnecessary. Second, in my opinion a retail park in Bedford is not notable as per Wikipedia's definition. Thats is why I proposed the article for deletion. You obviously do not agree so please make your point on the article's talk page.--ukexpat (talk) 16:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you have posted an inappropriate comment on my talk page. I have explained to you already how to deal with your grievance over the PRODWarning. Resorting to personal attacks is unnecessary. As you appear to be a teenager I will let it go this time, but any future incivility will be reported.--ukexpat (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of The New Eyrie

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The New Eyrie, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The New Eyrie seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The New Eyrie, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Clarabut and plumbe

A tag has been placed on Clarabut and plumbe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chris (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Harpur Centre,Bedford

A tag has been placed on Harpur Centre,Bedford, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bleaney (talk) 01:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Claire Macaulay

A tag has been placed on Claire Macaulay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WebHamster 09:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

AfD nomination of Sarah Walker (the Presenter)

An editor has nominated Sarah Walker (the Presenter), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Walker (the Presenter) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Darren Dowling

A tag has been placed on Darren Dowling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth (talk) 03:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Andrew Clover

A tag has been placed on Andrew Clover requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 15:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Harry-fox! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Barrie Hall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy

Hi. Just so you are aware, I have deleted your userpage pursuant to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy. I have done this because your userpage lists your age as well as your location, and in the interest of your safety I ask you do not place that information on your userpage until you are older. For more information please see WP:CHILD, and Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 04:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carla Lynch

The article Carla Lynch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No meeting of WP:GNG and no likelihood given lack of RS online. Delete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]