User talk:Harmi.banik

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harmi.banik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

REASON my first time wikipedia use for fun please forgime me about that i will never do that second time and to constructive work on wikipedia

Decline reason:

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click the Edit tab at the top of that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:48, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So what will you do if unblocked, exactly? Do you have a specific article in mind to work on? Max Semenik (talk) 14:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yes of course .... this time i will do constructive work. suppose i will write about frontech. an electronic vendor.

and more editing works etc about mathematical articles , lots about electronic articles, etc etc etc.

and please tell me what else you want to know.

Your use of User:Admns, a CU verified sock, is not convincing us that your ready for an unblock. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 19:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been unblocked for another blocked account which is illegal please unblock me i swallow a thousand word i will always use wikipedia guideline please

Please also stop using the {{unblock reviewed}} template as it's considered as a disruption if you try to fake a successful unblock request. If it continues, you will loose edit access to this page as well.

In order to even consider unblocking this user account, please give us some arguments for why you should be. Read the notices and comments above, and address the issues mentioned. Promising to read the policies and guidelines _after_ you are unblocked will get you nowhere. Bjelleklang - talk 21:11, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]