User talk:Harlock81
Welcome!
[edit]Hello Harlock81, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. --Kralizec! (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Come ti senti?
[edit]Ciao harlock. Come ti senti ora? Torno da lavoro, apro il computer e vedo che in meno di 20 minuti, Avversario ha convinto un amministratore che sono un troll. Addirittura che sono un sockpuppet di un altra utenza. Addirittura che sono un omofobico che porta avanti una campagna antilgbt o cosa non so. Spero ti senta sereno. Che gusto ti dà la mancanza di contraddittorio? che soddisfazione può dare non voler sentire cos'hanno da dire gli altri. E pensare che io e te si aveva pure iniziato a lavorare per trovare un forma coerente con le considerazioni di entrambi.
Non hannno aspettato neanche di interpellarmi. Venti minuti di segnalazioni assurde in cui avversario cambia la cronologia dei fattti, se ne inventa di tutti i colori, piccato e adirato chissà da cosa. Ed eccomi qua. Migliaia di contributi all'enciclopedia, una pagina, Rodi Garganico; portata con diligenza e impegno in vetrina, collaborazioni su decine di progetti, tutto nel cesso, perchè c'è chi la prende sul personale, perchè se scrivo Wladimiro Guadagno DETTO Vladimir Luxuria non merito risposta, devo essere messo all'indice. Io spero tu ti senta sereno Harlock, ma da quel poco che ho potuto capire di te nel leggere i tuoi interventi secondo me un dubbio nella testa ti aleggia, che non sia poi giusto. Secondo me tu eri per il confronto. Ti ci impegnavi nel rispondermi e l'ho apprezzato (te l'ho scritto). Invece c'è chi il confronto lo rifugge, ne ha paura. Che segnalazione manipolatoria ha fatto Avversario. Mi ha lasciato di stucco. Complimenti ragazzi, siete dei vincenti. Anche se per te Harlock mi dispiace un po'. Ciao, --Theirrulez (talk) 20:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Rispondi qui
[edit]E' più corretto, io non posso farlo su it.wiki, ora che la mia pagina di discussione utente è fuori dal mio controllo.
Non sto contestandoti il tuo comportamento in fase della segnalazione su di me, ho visto che non hai partecipato, e secondo me, tu che conosci i fatti, avrai maturato un piccolo dubbio che il blocco sia stato strumentale da parte di Dispe.
Sai bene che non ho mai sottovalutato il consenso. Tant'è vero che ho chiesto a te di correggere la tabella, perchè vladimir luxuria non era pertinente al campione che tu stesso avevi indicato, non è così? Anche se le mie dispute sono nate con te per primo siamo stai io e te ad iniziare stamane un confronto, giusto? Valuta dentro di te, Harlock.. sai perfettamente, chiaramente, senza alcun dubbio, che Dispe ha intentato la segnalazione su di me con intento vendicativo. Seguito da Cirimbillo al quale non era andato giù il mio giudizio sulla pagina joachim Olsen, candidata per la vetrina.
Ti dico di più, se questo dev'essere il modo di risolvere le divergenze di vedute qui non sono più interessato al confronto. Tienitela la pagina su Luxuria, scrivila come vuoi tu, anzi come vuole Dispe, poichè io terminato il blocco (che spero verrà ridotto, perchè wiki per me è molto importante) non tornerò più sulla discussione.
Dispe l'ha azzerata. Se la può tenere. E fidati che le cattiverie come la sua segnalazione manipolatoria ed enfatizzata in genere tornano indietro.
Ciao, sinceramente --Theirrulez (talk) 23:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Harrison
[edit]Buonasera Harlock, sono Harrison. Ti sto scrivendo perché possiedo un account in inglese e dato che sono bloccato per un mese volevo precisare un pò di cose:
- Ammetto di avere avuto un tono poco consono all'enciclopedia.
- Ammetto di aver esagerato con Blackcat anche se ho detto cose assolutamente vere, poiché è dell'UAAR veramente.
- Sull'IP c'è stato un disguido perché davo il consenso al commento di Parnajjide.
Tuttavia vorrei che mi fosse riconosciuto che:
- Sono stato insultato da Blackcat come contrabbandare la verità, clericale, teodem oltre al mettersi d'accordo con sé stesso, bufale al cubo e altre cose.
- Non sono stato io ad aprire io la pagina contro Blackcat come segnalazione anche se avrei voluto dopo il blocco.
- Non sono un sockpuppet o troll di nessuno.
- Vorrei contribuire alla voce o altre voci.
In merito al blocco non mi è stato concesso di poter replicare alle accuse. Non dico di togliermelo ma perlomeno ridiscutere e abbassarlo a due settimane. In merito agli attacchi che ho ricevuto dal segnalante. Questo mi auguro che me lo riconoscete. Non aprirò nessuna segnalazione contro Sergio però desidero avere l'opportunità di riniziare al più presto.--HarrisonIT (talk) 20:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
International Space Station
[edit]Hi Harlock81,
You are correct about that reference, crews spend around 160 man-hours per week doing scientific experiments (for a smaller crew), I just haven't looked for a better reference for the larger crew on board. The number of people changes, and so the amount of work they in total changes. I have been too busy to look for a better reference. You can do what you want with it, but remember to change the number of people as well, so 250 hours is for 6 people, 160 hours is for, I think it might be 4 people? I'm not sure. You could delete the whole lot if you want to, it's old and not important, I don't know what to do there. Penyulap talk 00:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Harlock81. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your help desk question
[edit]No one answered but you wanted to know how to get a file that was deleted on Commons. I don't know and have time to investigate right now but maybe you can try asking again and someone will know.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Harlock81. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Harlock81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)