User talk:Hariboneagle927/2018/September

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NorthPort Batang Pier logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:NorthPort Batang Pier logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AFF Suzuki Cup 2018 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AFF Suzuki Cup 2018 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Xiamen Airlines Flight 8667 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xiamen Airlines Flight 8667 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiamen Airlines Flight 8667 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brandmeister^talk 10:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bangabandhu Gold Cup logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox football academy

Template:Infobox football academy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IECO Green Warriors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asia League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Philippine Military Academy seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philippine Military Academy seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.P.–Ayala Land TechnoHub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commonwealth Avenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Need help: rewrite Presidency of Rodrigo Duterte

Can I ask for help regarding the article about the presidency of Rodrigo Duterte, as one user pointed out many issues, like bias, length, and factuality. Much of the article is biased against the President, and IPs have added too many content (including biased and unverified info from news articles) that makes it too tedious to edit myself. I seek to have the article rewritten at least to the quality of presidency articles of previous presidents. Thanks.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 23:29, 30 September 2018 (UTC)