User talk:HappySadJunkie

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to AK-47, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: AK-47 was changed by HappySadJunkie (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864172 on 2011-12-28T20:09:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HappySadJunkie. Thank you. You may comment at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HappySadJunkie
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 20:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HappySadJunkie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware of Wikipedias policy on having multiple accounts. Im sorry about that, it wont happen again and i promise never to use the account HappySadClown or create any others again.

Decline reason:

Declined pending result of sockpuppet report - see below -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But you were warned that you shouldn't vandalise that article (as if it was unclear before), yet you created a second account and continued disrupting the page with two accounts instead of one. Didn't you think it was a bad idea? What are you planning to do if unblocked? Max Semenik (talk) 13:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we seem to have multiple issues - your initial contributions to articles are not conducive to a collection of knowledge, and are vandalism. If unblocked, how are you actually going to contribute positively to this project? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, about that, ill avoid the AK-47 article and articles related to firearms for good! My true account is User:Doughnuthead tbh but im starting fresh lads!! :D--HappySadJunkie (talk) 13:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked - vandals don't get to start afresh by making new accounts and engaging in further vandalism -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doughnuthead for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]