Jump to content

User talk:HappyAppy10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relevant thread

[edit]

I hope you will take a look here and that you can find some ability to collaborate: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=1167982183#User_is_uninterested_in_collaboration_and_has_frequent_issues_with_editingJustin (koavf)TCM 01:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not responding and honestly I did not I was supposed to respond but now I do. Like I said in my request, this past week has been a learning experience for me, and I have sincerely taken the time to think about my actions. I am willing to find some ability to collaborate if given an another chance. Thanks. – HappyAppy10 (talk) 15:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I'm not an admin on this wiki, so I can't block or unblock anyone. Since Yamla seems to think that the below text is inappropriate, you may want to ping him. Either way, thanks for your response. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 17:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, for the response, Have a good day.-HappyAppy10 (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Glad to see you back. Onwards and upwards. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 00:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]
Stop icon
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You need to respond when other users have concerns about your edits. Telling other editors to "get a life", which you have done repeatedly over multiple years, is not appropriate. If you would like to be unblocked, you need to make a commitment to being responsive and civil when other users raise an issue on your talk page. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HappyAppy10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to request that my block be removed. I feel like it is no longer necessary because I have taken the time these past few days to think about my actions that got me blocked. I admit my actions and sincerely apologize for my immaturity. It has been eye-opening to me. I have a hard time accepting criticism, and during this time it has been a learning experience for me. If I do get my block removed, I will make a commitment to better myself, control my attitude, and try my best to reply to people if they comment on my talk page. Once again, I apologize, especially if I have offended anyone. I just edit here for the fun of it and try to improve articles, especially when they are related to a topic of interest to me. If you need me to help with anything, feel free to let me know. Thanks. HappyAppy10 (talk) 17:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request was generated by an AI, raising serious WP:CIR concerns and demonstrating clearly it would be inappropriate to lift the block. Yamla (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HappyAppy10 - I'm willing to unblock you with a couple conditions. First, you must always remain civil; another "get a life" and you will be indefinitely blocked again. Second, you must respond to every post about your editing on your talk page (no blanking), and make a good faith attempt to resolve any dispute. Do you agree to these conditions? — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree to these conditions. I am very appreciative of this opportunity. Thank you. Quick question just to make sure. Now, if a bot leaves a message for dablink notifications, etc., do I have to respond to it or what should I say? – HappyAppy10 (talk) 00:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a bot, you don't have to respond. You only have to respond if someone has a question/concern/etc about the edits you're making. I'll unblock you now. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thanks. HappyAppy10 (talk) 00:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Gregg Wattenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Castro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Idol contestants discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Man with the Bag.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Kelly Clarkson Show (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1985 (song).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris DeStefano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Young (musician).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brewing in North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forsyth County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]