User talk:Happinessfabric

September 2015

Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Youth for Human Rights International. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to find out how we can collaborate on a more up to date page. Many of the citations you have are more than 5 years out of date. Also, while the non-profit does work in collaboration with the church, the non-profit is a completely separate entity. I feel your edits are misleading that YHRI and the church are inextricably linked. Please let me know how you would like to collaborate to update sources or remove them (which was my intention) and edit the page accordingly. I'm thinking that perhaps we can consolidate the talk about the collaboration with the church in the "Criticisms" section of the page? Thoughts on that? I just don't agree with the complete saturation of it in every section.

The appropriate place to discuss this is Talk:Youth for Human Rights International. Repeatedly removing sourced material and restoring your version after multiple editors have reverted you is not an appropriate way to deal with these issues. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources, especially independent sources, for content. Those sources all emphasize the YHRI's strong connection to the Church of Scientology. Wikipedia is not censored, and being a few years old doesn't invalidate a source. Again, if you would like to make changes to the article, the place to discuss it is Talk:Youth for Human Rights International. Edit warring will just get you banned. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Your recent editing history at Youth for Human Rights International shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to find out how we can collaborate on a more up to date page. While the non-profit does work in collaboration with the church, the non-profit is a completely separate entity. I feel your edits are misleading that YHRI and the church are inextricably linked. Please let me know how you would like to collaborate to update sources or remove them (which was my intention) and edit the page accordingly. I'm thinking that perhaps we can consolidate the talk about the collaboration with the church in the "Criticisms" section of the page? Thoughts on that? I just don't agree with the complete saturation of it in every section.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Happinessfabric reported by User:Grayfell (Result: ). Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 04:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]