User talk:Happenstancial

Hello, Happenstancial, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Your first article
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom budget

Hi Happenstancial, I noticed you added a (very nice) pie chart to United Kingdom budget. However, (you knew that was coming, eh?) I am wondering whether it's a good idea to put data for a particular year into the all-years article, at least if it doesn't come with some kind of explanation.

I suggest the options would be to move the chart to the 2009 budget (linked from the article), or to tweak the image caption to say it's an example. What do you think? Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it should be in the 2009 page, and cited as an example, cheers CC Happenstancial (talk) 15:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance templates

Hi Happenstancial. Thank you for your contributions but please do not remove article maintenance templates, as you did here, without first fixing the problem, or else leave an edit summary explaining why the template no longer applies. This is especially important where references are needed. To understand why this is important please take a look at our verifiability policy.

I have reverted a few of your edits that have done this. Although the edit summaries said "copy edit" the rest of the edit seemed to be fairly trivial with insertion of paragraph breaks and similar. You are welcome to reapply these edits with the retention of the maintenance templates. Spinning Spark 19:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Newt Gingrich presidential campaign, 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Social engineering and Wonk

Mita (Inca) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Potosi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mass hysteria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IDF and Histrionic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rumors

Category:Rumors, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]