User talk:Hans Footballscout2023

Re: Transfermarkt[edit]

What you're missing here is that Transfermarkt's stats database is user-edited. Anyone with account an account on the site can submit changes. This has led to problems in the past with incorrect information that likely originated on Wikipedia, making it's on to Transfermarkt. As such, it is considered a self-published and there unreliable source. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not true, your information is not accurate. Not anyone has the option to edit something on transfermarkt. I agree that you can make a suggestion but still a supervisor has to accept your edit and check with the sources. Nowadays a lot of scouting is dependent of Data of TransferMarkt and they are aware of that so they have enough professionals en people who review it. It is not self-published at all. If you think so you can go ahead and try to edit something, but trust me you can't change anything without approval and enough sources after the review. Hans Footballscout2023 (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Sputnik Hans Footballscout2023 (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Sputnik Correction proposals are send to our data administrators via a form. It is always a good idea to include a short note on where you have your information from in the field "Notes to data admin". Hans Footballscout2023 (talk) 22:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per the site's own documentation, most of the administrators mentioned in that quote are also volunteer contributors, not Transfermarkt staff. The review process does not change the site's character as a self-published source. Also take note that in brief period you've been active here, there are already four experienced editors push back on your use of Transfermarkt as a source. It's unsuitability as a source is a settled question. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With al due respect but your research is lacking mate. I Have been working in the football scouting for over 20 years. Transfermarkt is definitely not a self-published source. You can make a request with the suggestion if you would like to edit or add something, but you'll never be able to make any changes yourself. So every time you would like to change a profile or create one the datascout/analyst will review it and check their sources.It is funny how you say that it not reliable because it is user-edited. However as I explained to you it is not user-edited, they have data-analysts and moderators for that.

Footballclubs use the data of Transfermarkt all the time for scouting, but also for their financial annual statements if you did not know that. It became a big business in the last couple years and it seems like all of you missed that part of their development. If you were in the football industry you would understand the significance of Transfermarkt in comparison with other weak sources like Soccerway (that's a copy paste).

Please make sure you do proper research regarding Transfermarkt, given your reply it still seems you don't know how the process works over there and what the importance for the football industry is.

Wikipedia is not reliable. Seems to have a worse character. On wikipedia it is way more easy to create an article and publish it. On transfermarkt it doesn't work like that. Nothing will be published or changed untill the data-analysts and moderators did their due-dilligence. Hopefully you learned something from my explanation and the research. So far your claims are false and you didn't do your homework.

All the best. Hans Footballscout2023 (talk) 13:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrick Loa Loa[edit]

The article Patrick Loa Loa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 02:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jaouhar Ben Hassen moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jaouhar Ben Hassen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wael Romdhane. See this edit, which was unacceptable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone he deleted mine too... So you should probably warn him first Hans Footballscout2023 (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to restore my edit, submitted earlier than yours, from your vandalism. After restoring my edit, I immediately checked to see if I caused any damage while restoring my edit and corrected that as well! gidonb (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrés Camilo Mosquera Hoyos for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrés Camilo Mosquera Hoyos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrés Camilo Mosquera Hoyos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jaouhar Ben Hassen[edit]

Hello, Hans Footballscout2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jaouhar Ben Hassen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]