User talk:Hans Engstrom

You have been spamming lots of arricles with the following boxes {{Disputed}} {{POV}} {{COI}} Most of those articles do not have any discussions at all, thus your claim that facts have been disputed are false. If you have any claims or facts, you better discuss them as everyone does here at wiki. To clean your spams is an extra burden for us in keeping wiki clean and correct. Please cooperate. --Malin Randstrom (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC) Malin, as you have no idea about the issues you post on, as proven again and again, the boxes will be replaced as fast as you remove them. Your personal vendetta against anyone attempting to edit these pages certainly merit them being there.[reply]

Arbitration

Please follow the steps in the dispute resolution process before attempting to file an arbitration case. I had removed your edits from there. Best. Synergy 21:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom

Hi -- Arbcom is the last step in dispute resolution, only to be used if all else fails. For the dispute you are having, the next step is probably to make a concrete proposal on the talk page of the article in question, and see whether other editors support it. If that breaks down, the next step is to try an RFC. If that doesn't lead to improvement, you go to ANI. Only if you find yourself having problems over and over again should you go to Arbcom for help. Looie496 (talk) 21:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ARBCOM

Dear all, This dispute has been ongoing for at least three years. As regards a concrete proposal, I refer to the talk page of the main article. As usual, Wikipedias main problem lies with users with an axe to grind.

To what dispute and to which article are you referring? —Travis ^talk 22:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ooops, http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Military_ranks_of_the_Swedish_armed_forces Currently it's in pretty good shape, but that tends to only last a little while. Hans Engstrom (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I see many fractured discussions there, but no concrete effort to gain a consensus. The dispute resolution page provides a great deal of information on how to resolve your issues. Cheers —Travis ^talk 22:31, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Military ranks of the Swedish armed forces. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Gsmgm (talk) 09:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for 3RR. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

At Military ranks of the Swedish armed forces, reported at [1]. EdJohnston (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hans Engstrom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm actually fine with the block if the other user is blocked as well. See my comments at COI regarding User:Malin_Tokyo

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 15:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The other party was not blocked for WP:3RR because she did not make four reverts in 24 hours, as Hans did. If you want to be unblocked, it would be more sensible to offer a plan for peacefully resolving the dispute once you return to editing. EdJohnston (talk) 15:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Credit

Haj Hans, Jag ville bara ge dig uppmuntran för att du orkar! (jag gissar du förstår vad jag menar?) Ghostrider (talk) 16:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mange takk! Hans Engstrom (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]