Jump to content

User talk:Hammon27/Coats of arms of U.S. Cavalry Regiments

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconHeraldry and vexillology NA‑class
WikiProject iconUser:Hammon27/Coats of arms of U.S. Cavalry Regiments is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Culture / North America / United States User‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
UserThis page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Untitled

[edit]

The work on the Cavalry Divisions is outstanding, but there is a new article about all types of Army Divisions, so, since this is an article about the regiments, I'm going to move the division parts to Division insignia of the United States Army. Without objection...Hammon27 17:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

28th Cavalry & others

[edit]

Regiments that presently don't have available images of their Coat of Arms, should place holders be left in their place, as was done before the information was moved? --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • well this has been gone over to death. but heres an idea.- how about if a unit exists but was never issued a coat of arms, it gets a blank spot with the explenation that "COA not issued". so people arnt wasting there time trying to find one. the otheres can just be assumed that there around but not digitized. Cav has a pile of numbers that were never used. and a short list should be included in the intro paragraph.