User talk:Ham II/Archive 2009
 | Do not edit this page. This is the archive of User talk:Ham II for the year 2009. (Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.) See the annual archives for 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024. |
Christ carrying the Cross
thanks for alerting me. Unfortunately I didn't get the message until it was too late. I left a comment on the deletions review page. [1] Amandajm (talk) 05:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Wicipedia llysgenhadaeth
Hello I was wondering if you would be willing to participate for Wikipedia: Local Embassy. Currently nobody represents the Welsh Language and I wanted to know if you would be willing to take this position? Regards Ijanderson (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Van Eyck
May I point to a misspelling in your list of important paintings? The name of Van Eyck's Canonicus is Van der Paele (not Paell!)--RPD (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Infobox
The infobox that you recently added to Saint Serapion (Zurbarán) as well as others are having red ink problems see discussion here: [2], please weigh in, thanks....Modernist (talk) 03:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
The source makes no mention of Julian Stallabrass being a Marxist, so I've removed that until a reliable source is produced. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's made quite clear in this interview. Ham 22:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- And that interview wasn't included in the article. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, no intention to be crabbish; it was late-ish and I was tired. It's there now. Ham 11:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- And that interview wasn't included in the article. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Template:Michelangelo
What did you fix in this edit? Both the before- and -after look the same on my screen, and the wikicode looks confusing with a missing "group1." Unless it makes a real difference, could you revert back to the old version? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- If you look at previous edit, you'll see that the background colours in the list field do not alternate as they should. list1, list3 etc. (i.e. odd numbers) have a white background; even numbers have a "whitesmoke" background. Previously the sequence went: white, whitesmoke, white, whitesmoke, white, white, whitesmoke, whitesmoke. Changing list1 and 2 in the sub-template to 2 and 3 made them alternate properly. Best, Ham 10:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ah. On my monitor you have to look very closely to notice. Could you add an html comment to that effect so your edit doesn't get reverted? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 13:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Now done. Ham 20:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ah. On my monitor you have to look very closely to notice. Could you add an html comment to that effect so your edit doesn't get reverted? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 13:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Ham, based on your conversation on the AFD, would you consider closing this nomination keep? We can do it immediately, allowing all editors involved to focus on all that encyclopedic stuff which really does need to be deleted. Thanks in advance, and thanks for considering it. Ikip (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)