User talk:HalloHelloHalloHello
Hello, I'm Samf4u. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my my talk page. Thank you. - Samf4u (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Does the fact that Jennie Adams the Ticket agent who let the terrorists bag and bomb on to the plane when the terrorist had no ticket and therefore the bag should not have been allowed onto the plane according to the anti terrorist rules at the time have anything to do with why the plane blew up? YES it does! So you are saying the bomb she let on the plane against the rules has nothing to do with the article even tho it explains how it happened?
How do you think the ONLY reason the plane was blown up by the terrorist? Is not constructive to the article?
Do you think disallowing such an important fact in a trial, paper even news paper report would be clearly biased reporting?
This is what I said "Does the fact that Jennie Adams the Ticket agent who let the terrorists bag and bomb on to the plane when the terrorist had no ticket and therefore the bag should not have been allowed onto the plane according to the anti terrorist rules at the time! Should it be in the article as it the ONLY reason the plane was blown up by the terrorist bomb that should not have been allowed on the plane!" Is anything incorrect with what I said? Which rule do you claim it breaks? How do you think it breaks that rule? Please explain! (I look forward to you avoiding the point)