User talk:Hairybeast92

Welcome!

Hello, Hairybeast92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Love vs. Money has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Love vs. Money has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Versus22_talk 00:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Love/Hate (The-Dream album). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Little Mountain 5 ^review! 00:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 in film

The edit you made "predicting" the gross of Watchmen is totally against Wikipedia policy. And reverting the update I did was very deconstructive. Just remember that everything needs to be verifiable when uploaded to an article. Thank you! BOVINEBOY2008 23:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

T-Wayne

I think a discussion would be a bit more constructive; see WP:AFD for details, follow the directions to nominate T-Wayne for deletion through the discussion process. If it seems overwhelming, I can start one on your behalf. --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 21:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hurricanechris-750921.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hurricanechris-750921.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Slickrick streettalkin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Slickrick streettalkin.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Slickrick petiti r1 c1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Slickrick petiti r1 c1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Slickrick petiti r1 c1.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Slickrick petiti r1 c1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Download

Don't change chart positions, like you did here, unless you also update the reference. TheJazzDalek (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't be a dick. All you had to do was add the reference, not cry about it. And exactly what part was me "talking shit"? TheJazzDalek (talk) 17:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not being a dick just because you unreasonably reverted an edit that was in fact true, i didn't even put that the song went no. 1, i put 48 which if you just look it up there would be no need for messaging me and i didn't say you were talking shit, i said starting shit as if you couldn't just look up the chart yourself, either way i got the reference. Let's just leave it at that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hairybeast92 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was not unreasonable to revert your edit. When I looked up the song just this morning, the most recent chart posted was from the 9th (had it not been mere hours before you changed it, I would have checked Billboard before reverting you). And telling you to source your changes to an article is not "starting shit", it's Wikipedia policy to do it, and particularly important for things like chart positions and sales figures. TheJazzDalek (talk) 18:30, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gone Fishing (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gone Fishing (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable mixtape with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheJazzDalek (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of When Fish Ride Bicycles

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article When Fish Ride Bicycles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable upcoming album with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TheJazzDalek (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to LL Cool J discography. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.