User talk:HairyDomBraz27

December 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Glenn Greenwald. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Do not deliberately misrepresent sources. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was fully sourced, in what way did I misrepresent them? HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 06:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know, as everything I posted was fully factual and supported by the cited sources. I will revert your revert if I do not hear back. HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 06:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Glenn Greenwald. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are clearly misrepresenting those cited sources. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not, clearly so. I don't believe you actually read the cited sources, have you. HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 06:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Glenn Greenwald. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to justify what about my edit is poorly sourced. HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 06:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you are doing, but you are going to get blocked soon. Writing an article about something does not make a journalist a "pornography producer". – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He owned StudMall.com and Hairy Jocks video, he was literally a pornography producer for eight years. Please read Glenn's own words where he says exactly this. HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 06:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess you should cite sources that actually say that because that is not in any of the sources you have cited. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first citation: "According to court documents, one of the distribution websites operated by MN Entertainment was StudMall, a gay porn DVD site. According to the New York state corporation and domain registry records, MN Entertainment and Stud Mall operated out of the same suites that housed Greenwald’s law firm"

That establishes he owned StudMall. The second citation establishes he was involved creatively. Historical WHOIS records also show Glenn Greenwald as the owner of StudMall.com, how should I cite those? HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 06:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also have images from the back of StudMall's DVD releases where David Miranda, Glenn Greenwald's husband, is listed as the custodian of records. HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 07:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As far as establishing his ownership of RioMaleEscorts, his husband David Miranda is in the article claiming he's an employee. HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 06:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of that establishes ownership of anything. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 07:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He also was the owner of the RioMaleEscorts domain in historical WHOIS records, how do I cite that? HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 07:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 07:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

domaintools.com has the domain history with his name clearly on it HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 07:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would this be sufficient to prove he owned StudMall.com? Glenn Greenwald of the Intercept denies producing film: I was a lawyer and business partner (uol.com.br) HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 07:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Business partner seems unambiguous HairyDomBraz27 (talk) 07:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]